Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17293400›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2007

The thermodynamics of general anesthesia.

Thomas Heimburg, Andrew D Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances in using ultrasound to regulate the nervous system.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The actions of volatile anesthetics: a new perspective.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Alcohol Interactions with Lipid Bilayers.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas HeimburgThe Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. theimbu@nbi.dk
Andrew D Jackson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is known that the action of general anesthetics is proportional to their partition coefficient in lipid membranes (Meyer-Overton rule). This solubility is, however, directly related to the depression of the temperature of the melting transition found close to body temperature in biomembranes. We propose a thermodynamic extension of the Meyer-Overton rule, which is based on free energy changes in the system and thus automatically incorporates the effects of melting point depression. This model accounts for the pressure reversal of anesthesia in a quantitative manner. Further, it explains why inflammation and the addition of divalent cations reduce the effectiveness of anesthesia.

Indexed as

Membrane FluidityModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularAnesthetics, GeneralCell MembraneComputer SimulationLipid BilayersPhase TransitionThermodynamicsTransition TemperatureAnesthetics, GeneralLipid Bilayers

Identifiers

PMID17293400
PMCPMC1852341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.