Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17293390›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2007

Chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) should be an accepted method in the routine diagnostic evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancer.

S Di Palma, N Collins, C Faulkes, B Ping, G Ferns, B Haagsma, G Layer, M W Kissin, M G Cook

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. EvaluatingOpen access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2018
    Article
  6. Chromogenic in situ hybridization compared with other approaches to evaluate HER2/neu status in breast carcinomas.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S Di PalmaHistopathology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XX, UK. silvana.dipalma@royalssurrey.nhs.uk
N Collins
C Faulkes
B Ping
G Ferns
B Haagsma
G Layer
M W Kissin
M G Cook

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genes, erbB-2Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastChromogenic CompoundsFemaleHumansIn Situ HybridizationPatient SelectionTrastuzumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsChromogenic CompoundsTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID17293390
PMCPMC1972421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.