Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17293364›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2007

Limited efficacy of conventional DMARDs after initial methotrexate failure in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis treated according to the disease activity score.

Sjoerd M van der Kooij, Jeska K de Vries-Bouwstra, Yvonne P M Goekoop-Ruiterman, Derkjen van Zeben, Pit J S M Kerstens, Andreas H Gerards, Johannes H L M van Groenendael, Johanna M W Hazes, Ferdinand C Breedveld, Cornelia F Allaart and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. My treatment approach to rheumatoid arthritis.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2012
    Guideline
  2. Leflunomide for treating rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patient satisfaction with virtual evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of CRPS.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sjoerd M van der KooijLeiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands. smvanderkooij@lumc.nl
Jeska K de Vries-Bouwstra
Yvonne P M Goekoop-Ruiterman
Derkjen van Zeben
Pit J S M Kerstens
Andreas H Gerards
Johannes H L M van Groenendael
Johanna M W Hazes
Ferdinand C Breedveld
Cornelia F Allaart
Ben A C Dijkmans
Leiden University Medical Center · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLSint Franciscus Gasthuis · NLErasmus MC · NLFranciscus Vlietland · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the efficacy of subsequent disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapies after initial methotrexate (MTX) failure in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), treated according to the DAS for 2 years.

methodsIn groups 1 and 2 of the BeSt study, 244 RA patients were initially treated with MTX 15-25 mg/week. Patients who discontinued MTX because of insufficient clinical response (disease activity score, DAS >2.4) or toxicity were classified as "MTX failures." In group 1, these patients switched to sulfasalazine (SSA), then leflunomide and finally to MTX + infliximab (IFX). In group 2, "MTX failures" added SSA to MTX, then hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), then prednisone, and eventually switched to MTX + IFX. "MTX successes" were patients who achieved a DAS </=2.4 after 2 years while still on MTX monotherapy. Total Sharp/van der Heijde score (TSS) progression from 0-2 years was assessed in "MTX failures" versus "MTX successes."

resultsAfter 2 years, 162/244 patients (66%) had discontinued MTX because of insufficient response or toxicity. Of these, 78% also failed on SSA (adding or switching), 87% subsequently failed on leflunomide (in group 1), and 64% on MTX + SSA + HCQ (in group 2). 34 of 48 patients (71%) in groups 1 and 2 were successfully treated with MTX + IFX. After 2 years, regardless of the "success" on subsequent DMARDs, " MTX failures" had a median TSS progression of 3 units (mean 9) versus 1 unit (mean 3) in "MTX successes" (p = 0.007).

conclusionAfter failure on initial MTX, treatment with subsequent conventional DMARDs is unlikely to result in a DAS </=2.4 and allows progression of joint damage.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidArthrographyClinical ProtocolsDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHydroxychloroquineInfliximabIsoxazolesKaplan-Meier EstimateLeflunomideMaleAntibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntirheumatic AgentsHydroxychloroquineInfliximabIsoxazolesLeflunomideMethotrexatePrednisoneSulfasalazine

Identifiers

PMID17293364
PMCPMC1994290
OpenAlexW2024493032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.