Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17290434›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2007

Access to health insurance: experiences and attitudes of those with genetic versus non-genetic medical conditions.

Nancy E Kass, Amy M Medley, Marvin R Natowicz, Sara Chandros Hull, Ruth R Faden, Laura Plantinga, Lawrence O Gostin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The New Precision Stewards?Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Perception, experience, and response to genetic discrimination in Huntington disease: the international RESPOND-HD study.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Legal update: living with the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2008
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nancy E KassJohns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-1996, USA. nkass@jhsph.edu
Amy M Medley
Marvin R Natowicz
Sara Chandros Hull
Ruth R Faden
Laura Plantinga
Lawrence O Gostin

Funding

CONFIDENTIALITY, PRIVACY AND INSURANCER01HG001086 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FADEN, RUTH R · 1995 to 1997
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HG999999NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG01086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While studies reveal that individuals with both genetic and other chronic medical conditions have difficulty obtaining health insurance, no large-scale studies have compared the health insurance experiences of these groups. The goal of this study was to document and compare the health insurance experiences, attitudes, and beliefs of persons with genetic conditions to those of persons with or at risk for other serious medical conditions. We interviewed approximately 100 adults or parents of children with one of each of the following medical conditions: sickle cell disease (SCD), cystic fibrosis (CF), diabetes, and HIV, and 200 adults with or at risk for breast (BC) or colon cancer (CC). The interview included items related to respondents' experiences and attitudes regarding health insurance. Twenty-seven percent of 597 total respondents self-reported having been denied health insurance or offered insurance at a prohibitive rate. Respondents with single-gene disorders (CF and SCD) were twice as likely to report this as those with non-genetic conditions. Legislation that exists to limit genetic discrimination in insurance addresses genetic risks or traits only, however, rather than protecting those with actual disease. Thus, current legislation may not address the challenges faced by individuals like those in this study, who try to maintain access to health insurance when they or their children are symptomatic with a genetic or other serious health condition. More than one-third of all respondents thought there was a high chance they would be denied health insurance in the future or their insurance would become unaffordable. That individuals with all six health conditions expressed concern regarding their ability to obtain future health insurance suggests policy proposals should be broad-based, addressing the needs and concerns of individuals with diverse health conditions.

Indexed as

Genetic Diseases, InbornHealth Services AccessibilityInsurance, HealthAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID17290434
PMCPMC4815905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.