A broader view of animal research.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Translational research in atrial fibrillation: a quest for mechanistically based diagnosis and therapy.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2012
   Review
2. The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis?BMC neuroscience · 2010
   Article
3. Fatigue and sleep during cancer and chemotherapy: translational rodent models.Comparative medicine · 2008
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review.2007

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as