ArticleDer Anaesthesist2007
[Acute coronary syndrome. Guideline-conform management by regional and interregional care concepts].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with 16% is one of the most common indication for emergency missions. Care of ACS patients in the Heidelberg emergency service region has been carried out since the beginning of 2005 following an interdisciplinary developed concept based on the current guidelines of the German Society for Cardiology (DGK), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC). MATERIALS AND
methodsEvaluation of the emergency diagnostic and therapeutic measures for the diagnosis of ACS before and after the introduction of the ACS care concept, was carried out retrospectively for the years 2004 (group 1) and 2005 (group 2) by electronic data processing of the records stored in the emergency medical services documentaion system (NADOK).
resultsIn the years 2004 before (group 1, n=633) and 2005 after (group 2, n=628) introduction of the ACS care concept, there was a comparable basic diagnostic consisting of a 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG; 95 versus 97%), manual blood pressure measurement (93 versus 95%) and pulse oxymetry (94 versus 91%) as well as a comparable proportion of patients who received a peripheral vene access (99 versus 100%). There were no significant differences between the two groups. However, after the introduction of the ACS concept, the 12-lead ECG was used significantly more often (49 versus 71%, p=0.0001). Furthermore, a guideline-conform medicinal treatment of ACS patients was used inceasingly more often for anticoagulation with heparin/acetylsalicylic acid (75 versus 84%,p=0.0001) and the use of beta-receptor blockers (32 versus 39%, p=0.009) after introduction of the ACS concept.
conclusionsThe introduction of a regional care concept leads to an optimisation of guideline-conform prehospital treatment for ACS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.