Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17287527›Full record

ArticleGenetics2007

Reduced X-linked diversity in derived populations of house mice.

John F Baines, Bettina Harr

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Evolution across Mouse Spermatogenesis.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Population Genomics of the House Mouse and the Brown Rat.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sequence and Structural Diversity of Mouse Y Chromosomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Positive selection drives faster-Z evolution in silkmoths.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John F BainesInstitute for Genetics, Department of Evolutionary Genetics, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany.
Bettina Harr
University of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrasting patterns of X-linked vs. autosomal diversity may be indicative of the mode of selection operating in natural populations. A number of observations have shown reduced X-linked (or Z-linked) diversity relative to autosomal diversity in various organisms, suggesting a large impact of genetic hitchhiking. However, the relative contribution of other forces such as population bottlenecks, variation in reproductive success of the two sexes, and differential introgression remains unclear. Here, we survey 13 loci, 6 X-linked and 7 autosomal, in natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus) subspecies complex. We studied seven populations of three different subspecies, the eastern house mouse M. musculus castaneus, the central house mouse M. m. musculus, and the western house mouse M. m. domesticus, including putatively ancestral and derived populations for each. All populations display lower diversity on the X chromosomes relative to autosomes, and this effect is most pronounced in derived populations. To assess the role of demography, we fit the demographic parameters that gave the highest likelihood of the data using coalescent simulations. We find that the reduction in X-linked diversity is too large to be explained by a simple demographic model in at least two of four derived populations. These observations are also not likely to be explained by differences in reproductive success between males and females. They are consistent with a greater impact of positive selection on the X chromosome, and this is supported by the observation of an elevated K(A) and elevated K(A)/K(S) ratios on the rodent X chromosome. A second contribution may be that the X chromosome less readily introgresses across subspecies boundaries.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsAnimals, WildBase SequenceComputer SimulationDNA PrimersEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene FlowGenetics, PopulationMaleMiceModels, GeneticPolymorphism, GeneticPopulation DensityProteinsDNA PrimersProteins

Identifiers

PMID17287527
PMCPMC1855135
OpenAlexW2140876173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.