ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2007
Immunoblot assay using recombinant antigens as a supplemental test to confirm the presence of antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi.
Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison between chimeric Trypanosoma cruzi antigens (ABBOTT PRISM Chagas assay) and local antigenic extracts in blood bank screening for Chagas disease in an endemic area for the Triatoma dimidiata vector.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2025Article
- Assessment of Alinity s ChagasLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Diversity of Chagas disease diagnostic antigens: Successes and limitations.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Review
- Evaluation of the Performance of Ortho T. cruzi ELISA Test System for the Detection of Antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Chagas Western Blot IgG Assay for the Diagnosis of Chagas Disease.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Towards a New Strategy for Diagnosis of Congenital Trypanosoma cruzi Infection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
- A New Development in Trypanosoma cruzi Detection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
- Serological Diagnosis of Chronic Chagas Disease: Is It Time for a Change?Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Article
- Performance of six diagnostic tests to screen for Chagas disease in blood banks andprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection among donors with inconclusive serologyscreening based on the analysis of epidemiological variables.Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia · 2012Article
- Diagnosis of parasitic diseases: old and new approaches.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2009Article
- The emergence of chagas disease in the United States and Canada.Current infectious disease reports · 2007Article
- Trypanosoma cruzi infection in transfusion medicine.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyReview
- Perspectives on Trypanosoma cruzi-induced heart disease (Chagas disease).Progress in cardiovascular diseasesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of chronic Chagas' disease is generally made by detecting antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi. Most conventional serological tests are based on lysates of whole parasites or semipurified antigen fractions from T. cruzi epimastigotes grown in culture. The occurrence of inconclusive and false-positive results has been a persistent problem with the conventional assays, and there is no universally accepted gold standard for confirmation of positive test results. We describe here an immunoblot assay for detecting antibodies to T. cruzi in which four chimeric recombinant antigens (rAgs), designated FP3, FP6, FP10, and TcF, are used as target antigens. Each of these rAgs is composed of several antigenically distinct regions and includes repetitive as well as nonrepetitive sequences. Each rAg is coated as a discrete line on a nitrocellulose strip. Assay sensitivity was assessed by testing 345 specimens known to be positive for antibodies to T. cruzi. All 345 of these samples showed two to four reactive test bands in addition to the three on-board control bands that are on each strip. Assay specificity was determined by testing 500 specimens from random U.S. blood donors, all of which gave negative results. Based on the results obtained in this study, we propose the following scheme for interpretation of test results: (i) no bands or a single test band = a negative result; (ii) two or more test bands with at least one band showing intensity of 1+ or higher = a positive result; and (iii) multiple faint test bands (+/-) = indeterminate result. Based on this scheme, the prototype immunoblot assay showed sensitivity of 100% (n = 345) and specificity of 100% (n = 500). Additionally, all 269 potentially cross-reacting and T. cruzi antibody-negative specimens tested negative in our immunoblot assay. The rAg-based immunoblot assay has potential as a supplemental test for confirming the presence of antibodies to T. cruzi in blood specimens and for identifying false-positive results obtained with other assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.