Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17287316›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2007

Immunoblot assay using recombinant antigens as a supplemental test to confirm the presence of antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi.

Kevin Y Cheng, Chi-Deu Chang, Vince A Salbilla, Louis V Kirchhoff, David A Leiby, Gerald Schochetman, Dinesh O Shah

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assessment of Alinity s ChagasLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A New Development in Trypanosoma cruzi Detection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnosis of parasitic diseases: old and new approaches.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Trypanosoma cruzi infection in transfusion medicine.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin Y ChengEmerging Pathogens and Infectious Diseases R&D, Abbott Diagnostics Division, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL 60064, USA.
Chi-Deu Chang
Vince A Salbilla
Louis V Kirchhoff
David A Leiby
Gerald Schochetman
Dinesh O Shah
American Red Cross · USAbbott Fund · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of chronic Chagas' disease is generally made by detecting antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi. Most conventional serological tests are based on lysates of whole parasites or semipurified antigen fractions from T. cruzi epimastigotes grown in culture. The occurrence of inconclusive and false-positive results has been a persistent problem with the conventional assays, and there is no universally accepted gold standard for confirmation of positive test results. We describe here an immunoblot assay for detecting antibodies to T. cruzi in which four chimeric recombinant antigens (rAgs), designated FP3, FP6, FP10, and TcF, are used as target antigens. Each of these rAgs is composed of several antigenically distinct regions and includes repetitive as well as nonrepetitive sequences. Each rAg is coated as a discrete line on a nitrocellulose strip. Assay sensitivity was assessed by testing 345 specimens known to be positive for antibodies to T. cruzi. All 345 of these samples showed two to four reactive test bands in addition to the three on-board control bands that are on each strip. Assay specificity was determined by testing 500 specimens from random U.S. blood donors, all of which gave negative results. Based on the results obtained in this study, we propose the following scheme for interpretation of test results: (i) no bands or a single test band = a negative result; (ii) two or more test bands with at least one band showing intensity of 1+ or higher = a positive result; and (iii) multiple faint test bands (+/-) = indeterminate result. Based on this scheme, the prototype immunoblot assay showed sensitivity of 100% (n = 345) and specificity of 100% (n = 500). Additionally, all 269 potentially cross-reacting and T. cruzi antibody-negative specimens tested negative in our immunoblot assay. The rAg-based immunoblot assay has potential as a supplemental test for confirming the presence of antibodies to T. cruzi in blood specimens and for identifying false-positive results obtained with other assays.

Indexed as

ImmunoblottingAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanChagas DiseaseHumansRecombinant ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificityTrypanosoma cruziAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17287316
PMCPMC1865615
OpenAlexW2103797251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.