ArticleIntensive care medicine2007
Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 125 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Can Vena Cava Ultrasound Guided Volume Repletion Prevent Spinal Induced Significant Hypotension in Elective Surgical Patients? A Randomized, Case Control, Prospective Trial.
Volemic Resuscitation in Sepsis and Septic Shock
RApid Fluid Volume EXpansion (RVE) in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Circulatory Failure After the Initial Phase of Resuscitation. A Single-center, Open-label, Randomized Study Comparing 3 Strategies of RVE in Orléans, France.
The Impact of Modified Site for Radial Artery Cannulation on the Stability of Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring
Who cites it
125 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 465 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of distal versus conventional radial artery cannulation for invasive blood pressure monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Pooled it
- Does stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2014Pooled it
- Accuracy of plethysmographic indices as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2012Pooled it
- Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of anesthesia · 2011Pooled it
- Impact of early haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in patients undergoing emergency surgery: an open prospective, randomised trial.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2016Trial
- Continuous central venous oxygen saturation assisted intraoperative hemodynamic management during major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2015Trial
- Passive leg raise (PLR) during cardiopulmonary (CPR) - a method article on a randomised study of survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).BMC emergency medicine · 2014Trial
- Vascular pedicle width in acute lung injury: correlation with intravascular pressures and ability to discriminate fluid status.Critical care (London, England) · 2011Trial
- Continuous monitoring of ScvO(2) by a new fibre-optic technology compared with blood gas oximetry in critically ill patients: a multicentre study.Intensive care medicine · 2007Trial
- Changes in Central Venous Oxygen Saturation during Inpatient Hemodialysis.Blood purification · 2026Article
- Article
- Pressure Measurements Obtained from Intraosseous Access: Potential Clinical Applications Explored Using a Porcine Model.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Comparison of invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements in critically ill patients receiving norepinephrine.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Observational
- A KNN-based model for non-invasive prediction of hemorrhagic shock severity in prehospital settings: integrating MAP, PBiomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Comparison of Noninvasive Oscillometric and Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Measurements in Children Admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Journal of pediatric intensive care · 2024Article
- Utility of NICaS Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Determinants of acute kidney injury during high-power mechanical ventilation: secondary analysis from experimental data.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024Article
- The prognostic value of delta-lactate in critically ill children.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2023Article
- Association between central haemodynamics and renal function in advanced heart failure: a nationwide study from Sweden.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveShock is a severe syndrome resulting in multiple organ dysfunction and a high mortality rate. The goal of this consensus statement is to provide recommendations regarding the monitoring and management of the critically ill patient with shock.
methodsAn international consensus conference was held in April 2006 to develop recommendations for hemodynamic monitoring and implications for management of patients with shock. Evidence-based recommendations were developed, after conferring with experts and reviewing the pertinent literature, by a jury of 11 persons representing five critical care societies. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 17 recommendations were developed to provide guidance to intensive care physicians monitoring and caring for the patient with shock. Topics addressed were as follows: (1) What are the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features of shock in the ICU? (2) Should we monitor preload and fluid responsiveness in shock? (3) How and when should we monitor stroke volume or cardiac output in shock? (4) What markers of the regional and micro-circulation can be monitored, and how can cellular function be assessed in shock? (5) What is the evidence for using hemodynamic monitoring to direct therapy in shock? One of the most important recommendations was that hypotension is not required to define shock, and as a result, importance is assigned to the presence of inadequate tissue perfusion on physical examination. Given the current evidence, the only bio-marker recommended for diagnosis or staging of shock is blood lactate. The jury also recommended against the routine use of (1) the pulmonary artery catheter in shock and (2) static preload measurements used alone to predict fluid responsiveness.
conclusionsThis consensus statement provides 17 different recommendations pertaining to the monitoring and caring of patients with shock. There were some important questions that could not be fully addressed using an evidence-based approach, and areas needing further research were identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.