Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17284676›Full record

ArticleGenome research2007

A meiotic linkage map of the silver fox, aligned and compared to the canine genome.

Anna V Kukekova, Lyudmila N Trut, Irina N Oskina, Jennifer L Johnson, Svetlana V Temnykh, Anastasiya V Kharlamova, Darya V Shepeleva, Rimma G Gulievich, Svetlana G Shikhevich, Alexander S Graphodatsky and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computer Vision for Detection of Body Posture and Behavior of Red Foxes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  5. Application of YOLOv4 for Detection and Motion Monitoring of Red Foxes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  6. Genomic responses to selection for tame/aggressive behaviors in the silver fox (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetics of behavior in the silver fox.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2012
    Review
  16. Deciphering the genetic basis of animal domestication.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2011
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna V KukekovaJames A. Baker Institute for Animal Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA. avk5@cornell.edu
Lyudmila N Trut
Irina N Oskina
Jennifer L Johnson
Svetlana V Temnykh
Anastasiya V Kharlamova
Darya V Shepeleva
Rimma G Gulievich
Svetlana G Shikhevich
Alexander S Graphodatsky
Gustavo D Aguirre
Gregory M Acland
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUCornell University · USCalifornia University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

MODELS OF HEREDITY RETINAL DEGENERATIONR01EY006855 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUSTAVO David AGUIRRE, William A. Beltran · 1992 to 2026
$20.7M
Gene Therapy for Leber Congenital AmaurosisU10EY013729 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI HAUSWIRTH, WILLIAM W · 2001 to 2005
$11.5M
Molecular genetics of tame behaviorR21MH069688 · NIMH · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI KUKEKOVA, ANNA V · 2004 to 2005
$265k
Genetic architecture of the mammalian (canid) skeleton: silver fox (V.vulpes)R03TW007056 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI LARK, KARL GORDON · 2005 to 2007
$117k
CANINE MODELS OF HEREDITARY RETINAL DEGENERATIONSU01EY006855 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AGUIRRE, GUSTAVO DAVID · 1986 to 1992
–
FIC NIH HHS R03 TW007056NEI NIH HHS EY06855NEI NIH HHS EY13729NEI NIH HHS R01 EY006855NEI NIH HHS U10 EY013729NIMH NIH HHS MH069688NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH069688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A meiotic linkage map is essential for mapping traits of interest and is often the first step toward understanding a cryptic genome. Specific strains of silver fox (a variant of the red fox, Vulpes vulpes), which segregate behavioral and morphological phenotypes, create a need for such a map. One such strain, selected for docility, exhibits friendly dog-like responses to humans, in contrast to another strain selected for aggression. Development of a fox map is facilitated by the known cytogenetic homologies between the dog and fox, and by the availability of high resolution canine genome maps and sequence data. Furthermore, the high genomic sequence identity between dog and fox allows adaptation of canine microsatellites for genotyping and meiotic mapping in foxes. Using 320 such markers, we have constructed the first meiotic linkage map of the fox genome. The resulting sex-averaged map covers 16 fox autosomes and the X chromosome with an average inter-marker distance of 7.5 cM. The total map length corresponds to 1480.2 cM. From comparison of sex-averaged meiotic linkage maps of the fox and dog genomes, suppression of recombination in pericentromeric regions of the metacentric fox chromosomes was apparent, relative to the corresponding segments of acrocentric dog chromosomes. Alignment of the fox meiotic map against the 7.6x canine genome sequence revealed high conservation of marker order between homologous regions of the two species. The fox meiotic map provides a critical tool for genetic studies in foxes and identification of genetic loci and genes implicated in fox domestication.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingAnimalsDogsFoxesGenomeLod ScoreMeiosisMicrosatellite Repeats

Identifiers

PMID17284676
PMCPMC1800930
OpenAlexW2147470528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.