Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17284481›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2007

Variation in policies for the management of febrile neutropenia in United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group centres.

Bob Phillips, Karen Selwood, Sheila M Lane, Roderick Skinner, Faith Gibson, Julia C Chisholm, United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Outpatient and oral antibiotic management of low-risk febrile neutropenia are effective in children--a systematic review of prospective trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Developing a national 'low risk' febrile neutropenia framework for use in children and young people's cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bob PhillipsPaediatric Oncology Day Hospital, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK. bob.phillips@doctors.org.uk
Karen Selwood
Sheila M Lane
Roderick Skinner
Faith Gibson
Julia C Chisholm
United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the variation in the current UK management strategies for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in childhood. DESIGN AND

settingA postal survey of all 21 United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG) centres assessing and collating local policies, protocols or guidelines relating to the management of febrile neutropenia. Further direct contact was undertaken to clarify any uncertainties.

resultsAll 21 centres provided information. The policies used to manage febrile neutropenia in the centres around the UK vary in almost every aspect of management. Definitions of fever ranged from a persistent temperature of >37.5 degrees C to a single reading of >39 degrees C. Neutropenia was inconsistently defined as an absolute neutrophil count of <1x10(9), <0.75x10(9 )or <0.5x10(9). Choices of antibiotic approaches, empirical modifications and antistaphylococcal treatment were different in each protocol. The use of risk stratification was undertaken in 11 centres, with six using a policy of reduced intensity therapy in low risk cases. Empirical antifungal treatment was very poorly described and varied even more widely.

conclusionsThere was a great deal of variation in definitions and treatment of febrile neutropenia in the UKCCSG children's cancer treatment centres. A degree of variation as a result of local microbiological differences is to be expected, but beyond this we should seek to standardise the core of our approach to defining fever and neutropenia, risk stratification and duration of empirical therapy in a way that maintains safety, minimises resource utilisation and maximises quality of life.

Indexed as

AminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsChildDrug Administration ScheduleFeverHumansNeoplasmsNeutropeniaOpportunistic InfectionsProfessional PracticeRisk AssessmentUnited KingdomAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID17284481
PMCPMC2066132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.