ReviewDrugs2007
Optimising antimicrobial therapy in diabetic foot infections.
Review in Drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Topical Application of Antimicrobial Peptide PL-5 (Peceleganan) Spray on Mild to Moderate Infection of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.Journal of diabetes · 2026Trial
- Article
- Comparative study of culture, next-generation sequencing, and immunoassay for identification of pathogen in diabetic foot ulcer.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021Observational
- Structural and functional insights into a novel two-component endolysin encoded by a single gene in Enterococcus faecalis phage.PLoS pathogens · 2020Article
- Efficient induction of antimicrobial activity with vancomycin nanoparticle-loaded poly(trimethylene carbonate) localized drug delivery system.International journal of nanomedicine · 2017Article
- Antibiotherapy with and without bone debridement in diabetic foot osteomyelitis: A retrospective cohort study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2014Article
- In vivo efficacy of humanized ceftaroline fosamil-avibactam exposures in a polymicrobial infection model.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2013Article
- Article
- Treatment algorithms for chronic osteomyelitis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2012Review
- Diabetic foot infections with osteomyelitis: efficacy of combined surgical and medical treatment.Diabetic foot & ankle · 2012Article
- Antibiotic optimization in the difficult-to-treat patient with complicated intra-abdominal or complicated skin and skin structure infections: focus on tigecycline.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2010Article
- Development of new localized drug delivery system based on ceftriaxone-sulbactam composite drug impregnated porous hydroxyapatite: a systematic approach for in vitro and in vivo animal trial.Pharmaceutical research · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foot infections are common and the most serious lower extremity complication contributing to amputations, particularly in patients with diabetes mellitus. Infection is most often a consequence of foot ulcerations, which typically follows trauma to a neuropathic foot. Foot infections may be classified as mild, moderate and severe; this largely determines the approach to therapy. Gram-positive bacteria are the sole causative pathogens for most mild and moderate infections. These infections can usually be treated with culture-based narrow-spectrum antibacterials along with appropriate surgical debridement in an outpatient setting. In contrast, severe infections are often polymicrobial, requiring hospitalisation and treatment with broad-spectrum antibacterials along with appropriate medical and surgical interventions. The initial empirical antibacterial regimen may be tailored based on the results of culture and sensitivity tests from properly obtained specimens. Several antibacterial regimens have demonstrated effectiveness in randomised controlled trials, but no single regimen has shown superiority. Managing diabetic foot osteomyelitis is particularly controversial and requires reliable cultures to select an appropriate antibacterial regimen. Surgical resection of the infected and necrotic bone favours a good outcome in chronic osteomyelitis. The recommended duration of antibacterial therapy ranges from 1 to 4 weeks for soft tissue infection, to >6 weeks for unresected osteomyelitis. The incidence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection is increasing in both the healthcare setting and the community. This should be considered when selecting an antibacterial, especially if the patient does not improve with initial antibacterial therapy. Certain other organisms, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus spp., while potentially pathogenic, are often colonisers that do not require targeted therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.