Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17280720›Full record

ReviewTrends in pharmacological sciences2007

Neoceptors: reengineering GPCRs to recognize tailored ligands.

Kenneth A Jacobson, Zhan-Guo Gao, Bruce T Liang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. New paradigms in GPCR drug discovery.Biochemical pharmacology · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Structure and activation of rhodopsin.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2012
    Review
  8. Homology modeling of class a G protein-coupled receptors.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2012
    Article
  9. Remote control of neuronal signaling.Pharmacological reviews · 2011
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kenneth A JacobsonMolecular Recognition Section, Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. kajacobs@helix.nih.gov
Zhan-Guo Gao
Bruce T Liang

Funding

FUNCTIONALIZED CONGENERS OF BIOACTIVE COMPOUNDSZ01DK031115 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI JACOBSON, KENNETH ALAN · 1991 to 2008
$577k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK031115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts to model and reengineer the putative binding sites of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have led to an approach that combines small-molecule 'classical' medicinal chemistry and gene therapy. In this approach, complementary structural changes (e.g. based on novel ionic or H-bonds) are made in the receptor and ligand for the selective enhancement of affinity. Thus, a modified receptor (neoceptor) is designed for activation by tailor-made agonists that do not interact with the native receptor. The neoceptor is no longer activated by the native agonist, but rather functions as a scaffold for the docking of novel small molecules (neoligands). In theory, the approach could verify the accuracy of GPCR molecular modeling, the investigation of signaling, the design of small molecules to rescue disease-related mutations, and small-molecule-directed gene therapy. The neoceptor-neoligand pairing could offer spatial specificity by delivering the neoceptor to a target site, and temporal specificity by administering neoligand when needed.

Indexed as

LigandsAnimalsBinding SitesGenetic EngineeringGenetic TherapyHumansMolecular StructureQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID17280720
PMCPMC2495023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.