ArticleMaternal and child health journal2007
Accuracy of birth certificate and hospital discharge data: a certified nurse-midwife and physician comparison.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using linked data to explore medical complications associated with Robson classification of cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts, 2011 to 2018.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- Reliability of prospective and retrospective maternal reports of prenatal experiences.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- The roles of familial transmission and smoking during pregnancy on executive function skills: A sibling-comparison study.Development and psychopathology · 2022Article
- Maternal Body Mass Index and Use of Labor Neuraxial Analgesia: A Population-based Retrospective Cohort Study.Anesthesiology · 2018Article
- Bacterial vaginosis and adverse outcomes among full-term infants: a cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2016Article
- Risk Factors Associated with Very Low Birth Weight in a Large Urban Area, Stratified by Adequacy of Prenatal Care.Maternal and child health journal · 2016Article
- Are Birth Certificate and Hospital Discharge Linkages Performed in 52 Jurisdictions in the United States?Maternal and child health journal · 2015Article
- Validating the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry: a chart re-abstraction study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2015Article
- Reliability of gestational weight gain reported postpartum: a comparison to the birth certificate.Maternal and child health journal · 2013Article
- Comparison of two measures of gestational age among low income births. The potential impact on health studies, New York, 2005.Maternal and child health journal · 2013Article
- Rising preterm birth rates, 1989-2004: changing demographics or changing obstetric practice?Social science & medicine (1982) · 2012Article
- Pregnancy outcome after treatment for Wilms tumor: a report from the national Wilms tumor long-term follow-up study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2010Article
- Surprisingly low compliance to local guidelines for risk factor based screening for gestational diabetes mellitus - A population-based study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2009Article
- Do differences in accuracy of vital records and hospital discharge data between physician and nurse-midwife attended births matter?Maternal and child health journal · 2009Article
- Sensitivity of birth certificate reports of birth defects in Atlanta, 1995-2005: effects of maternal, infant, and hospital characteristics.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBirth certificate and hospital discharge data are relied upon heavily for national surveillance and research on maternal health. Despite the great importance of these data sources, the recording accuracy in these datasets, comparing birth attendant type, has not been evaluated. The study objective was to assess the variation in chart documentation accuracy between certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) and physicians (MDs) for selected maternal variables using birth certificate and hospital discharge data.
methodsData was obtained on women delivering in 10 Washington State hospitals that had both CNM and MD-attended births in 2000 (n = 2699). Using the hospital medical record as the gold standard of accuracy, the true positive rate (TPR) for selected maternal medical conditions, pregnancy complications, and intrapartum and postpartum events was calculated for CNMs and MDs using birth certificate data, hospital discharge data, and both data sources combined.
resultsThe magnitude of TPRs for most recorded maternal medical conditions, pregnancy complications, and intrapatum and postpartum events was higher for CNMs than for MDs. TPRs were significantly higher in birth certificate records for pregnancy-induced hypertension, premature rupture of membranes, labor augmentation, induction of labor, and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) for CNM-attended births relative to MDs. Among combined data sources, CNM TPRs were significantly higher for pregnancy-induced hypertension and premature rupture of membranes.
conclusionsCNMs had consistently higher accuracy of recorded maternal medical conditions, pregnancy complications, and intrapartum and postpartum events when compared to MDs for all data sources, with several being statistically significant. Our findings highlight discrepancies between CNM and MD hospital chart documentation, and suggest that epidemiologic researchers consider the issue of measurement error and birth attendant type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17279323What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.