Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17279182›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2006

Controlling droplet-transmitted respiratory infections: best practices and cost.

William Hogg, Patricia Huston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Frequency of in-office emergencies in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2009
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

William HoggDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. whogg@uottawa.ca
Patricia Huston

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo promote incorporation of new guidelines on control of respiratory infections into family physicians' practices. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The World Health Organization website on pandemic influenza, the Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan, the Ontario guidelines on respiratory infection control, and research on implementing guidelines into family practice were reviewed. We also researched and calculated what the costs of implementing the guidelines would be. MAIN MESSAGE: Effective control of respiratory infections in physicians' offices can be achieved by displaying signs in the waiting room, having reception staff give masks to patients with cough and fever, instructing these patients to clean their hands with alcohol gel and to sit at least 1 m from others, inquiring about patients' or their close contacts' recent travel, using disinfectant wipes to clean possibly contaminated surfaces in waiting rooms and examining areas, and having staff and care providers wear masks and wash hands or use alcohol gel. The approximate annual cost of incorporating the guidelines is about 800 dollars per physician.

conclusionBecause the outbreak of an influenza pandemic is likely imminent, implementing standard guidelines for control of respiratory infections in primary care offices seems wise. Following these guidelines would help prevent patients and staff from contracting serious respiratory illnesses.

Indexed as

Family PracticeCommunicable Disease ControlDisease OutbreaksHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicRespiratory Tract Infections

Identifiers

PMID17279182
PMCPMC1783603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.