ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
The Manitoba Healthy Baby Prenatal Benefit Program: who is participating?
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrograms offering income supplements for lower-income pregnant women have been introduced in order to reduce the incidence of poor perinatal outcomes. This study used a population-based approach to examine the characteristics of mothers who received the Healthy Baby Prenatal Benefit in Manitoba.
methodsAll women giving birth between August 2001 and April 2003 (n = 22,643) were studied using de-identified linked administrative data. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine factors that predicted receipt of the benefit, adjusting for potential confounding effects. Separate regressions were run for all mothers, and for a group of mothers eligible to receive the benefit (N = 1962).
resultsAlmost 29% of mothers giving birth during the study period received the prenatal benefit. Mothers were more likely to receive the benefit if they: lived outside of Winnipeg; received income assistance during pregnancy; were younger at their first birth; were unmarried; made prenatal physician visits; experienced maternal depression; were having a first birth; and lived in the lowest income areas. Despite all being eligible, only 67% of non-Winnipeg and 80% of Winnipeg women receiving income assistance received the benefit. Factors related to benefit receipt for those eligible were: living in Winnipeg; making prenatal visits; not being a young teen at current birth; and experiencing a first birth.
conclusionIt is important to look not only at the characteristics of benefit recipients but also at those not receiving the benefit, in order to develop strategies to reach those who may most need and benefit from the program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17278681PMC6975739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.