ArticleBone marrow transplantation2007
CMV monitoring using blood cells and plasma: a comparison of apples with oranges?
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Detection of CMV in Saliva Can Mark a Systemic Infection with CMV in Renal Transplant Recipients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Human cytomegalovirus detection by real-time PCR and pp65-antigen test in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a challenge in low and middle-income countries.Pathogens and global health · 2013Article
- Comparison of quantitative cytomegalovirus real-time PCR in whole blood and pp65 antigenemia assay: clinical utility of CMV real-time PCR in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.Journal of Korean medical science · 2009Article
- Diagnostic value of HCMV pp65 antigen detection by FCA for symptomatic and asymptomatic infection: compared to quantification of HCMV DNA and detection of IgM antibody in infants.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2009Article
- Quantification of DNA in plasma by an automated real-time PCR assay (cytomegalovirus PCR kit) for surveillance of active cytomegalovirus infection and guidance of preemptive therapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2008Article
- Human cytomegalovirus infection and antiviral immunity in septic patients without canonical immunosuppression.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2008Review
- Prediction of cytomegalovirus (CMV) plasma load from evaluation of CMV whole-blood load in samples from renal transplant recipients.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2008Article
- Relationship between pp65 antigenemia levels and real-time quantitative DNA PCR for Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) management in immunocompromised patients.BMC infectious diseases · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative cytomegalovirus (CMV) monitoring is still far from being standardized between transplant centers. In the present study, we compared assays for quantitative CMV monitoring using blood cells and plasma. Four hundred and thirty-five consecutive samples from 29 patients with active CMV infection after allogeneic T-cell-depleted hemopoietic stem cell transplantation were tested in parallel using pp65 antigenemia and quantitative CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in blood cells and plasma (COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR). Although only 142 (53.1%) of 253 positive samples were concordantly identified by all three assays, the number of positive samples detected by each assay was not different and the quantitative values were correlated, provided that nucleic acid (NA) in plasma was isolated by COBAS AmpliPrep and not by the manual protocol. Six (18%) of 34 episodes with active CMV infection were not detected using CMV PCR in plasma; whereas in times of white blood cell aplasia or blast crisis of leukemia, samples with active CMV infection in plasma could not be detected using blood cells. We conclude that CMV monitoring in whole blood could be favorable compared with assays using plasma or blood cells alone. Automated NA isolation could become an attractive tool for a more sensitive and better standardized molecular diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.