Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17277014›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2007

Sex ratio and time to pregnancy: analysis of four large European population surveys.

Mike Joffe, James Bennett, Nicky Best, Tina Kold Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Ratio of boys to girls at birth.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mike JoffeDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College, London W2 1PG. m.joffe@imperial.ac.uk
James Bennett
Nicky Best
Tina Kold Jensen

Funding

Medical Research Council G9900635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test whether the secondary sex ratio (proportion of male births) is associated with time to pregnancy, a marker of fertility. Design Analysis of four large population surveys. Setting Denmark and the United Kingdom. Participants 49 506 pregnancies.

main outcome measureSecondary sex ratio.

resultsNo association was found between the sex ratio and time to pregnancy and no discernible trend was found for sex ratio with time to pregnancy, either within individual datasets or in the pooled analysis. The odds ratios were 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.04) for contraceptive failures, 1.01 (0.96 to 1.05) for time to pregnancy of 2-4 months, 1.02 (0.97 to 1.08) for 5-10 months, 0.98 (0.93 to 1.03) for 11 months or more, and 0.88 (0.74 to 1.06) for fertility treatment, with 0-1 months as the reference category.

conclusionNo association was found between the secondary sex ratio and time to pregnancy.

Indexed as

EuropeFemaleFertilityHumansPopulation SurveillancePregnancySex RatioTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID17277014
PMCPMC1819486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.