ArticleGene2007
Covalent genomic DNA modification patterns revealed by denaturing gradient gel blots.
Article in Gene, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- False negatives in GBA1 sequencing due to polymerase dependent allelic imbalance.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Discriminatory Information Patterns of Cytosine DNA Methylation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Article
- Information Thermodynamics of Cytosine DNA Methylation.PloS one · 2016Article
- Effects of non-CpG site methylation on DNA thermal stability: a fluorescence study.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Several approaches are used to survey genomic DNA methylation patterns, including Southern blot, PCR, and microarray strategies. All of these methods are based on the use of methylation-sensitive isoschizomer restriction enzyme pairs and/or sodium bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA. They have many limitations, including PCR bias, lack of comprehensive assessment of methylated sites, labor-intensive protocols, and/or the need for expensive equipment. Since the presence of 5-methylcytosine alters the melting properties of DNA molecules, denaturing gradient gel blots (DGG blots), a gene scanning technique which detects differences in DNA fragments based on differential melting behavior, were used to examine genomic modification patterns in normal tissues. Variations in melting behavior, observed as restriction fragment melting polymorphisms (RFMPs), were detected in various tissues from single individuals in all human and mouse genes tested, suggesting the presence of widespread differential cell type-specific DNA modification. Additional DGG blot experiments comparing genomic DNA to unmethylated cloned DNA suggested that the melting variants were most likely caused by DNA methylation differences. The results suggest that the use of DGG blots can provide a comprehensive and rapid method for comparing complex in vivo DNA modification patterns in normal adult somatic cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.