Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17276504›Full record

SynthesisJournal of fluency disorders2007

Genetic studies of stuttering in a founder population.

Jacqueline K Wittke-Thompson, Nicoline Ambrose, Ehud Yairi, Cheryl Roe, Edwin H Cook, Carole Ober, Nancy J Cox

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of fluency disorders, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nature and nurture in stuttering: a systematic review on the case of Moses.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Unraveling Stuttering Through a Multi-Omics Lens.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of recurrentAdvanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genetic contributions to stuttering: the current evidence.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2017
    Article
  9. Stuttering: Clinical and research update.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Characteristics of Fluency and Speech in Two Families With High Incidences of Stuttering.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Stuttering among children exposed to (family) high expressed emotion families.Annals of medical and health sciences research · 2013
    Article
  14. Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances.Journal of fluency disorders · 2013
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Stuttering: Genetic updates and a case report.Advanced biomedical research · 2012
    Article
  17. Genetic bases of stuttering: the state of the art, 2011.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2012
    Review
  18. Genetic approaches to understanding the causes of stuttering.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2011
    Article
  19. Using brain imaging to unravel the mysteries of stuttering.Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science · 2011
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline K Wittke-ThompsonDepartment of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
Nicoline Ambrose
Ehud Yairi
Cheryl Roe
Edwin H Cook
Carole Ober
Nancy J Cox
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICS AND REGULATIONT32GM007197 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ROTHMAN-DENES, LUCIA B. B · 1985 to 2020
$17.0M
T CELL CO-STIMULATION IN ALLERGIC ASTHMAP50HL056399 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WHITE, STEVEN R · 1996 to 2005
$9.1M
CONSORTIUM LINKAGE STUDIES OF TYPE 2 DIABETESU01DK058026 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI COX, NANCY J. · 1999 to 2004
$7.5M
Subtypes and Associated Risk Factors in StutteringR01DC005210 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI AMBROSE, NICOLINE GRINAGER · 2002 to 2013
$4.9M
CHARACTERIZING A 5P-LINKED BHR SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCUSR01HL066533 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OBER, CAROLE · 2000 to 2004
$2.4M
STUTTERING--A LINKAGE ANALYSISR01DC004415 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI COX, NANCY J. · 2000 to 2006
$1.7M
Robust Methods for Indentifying Genes for Complex TraitsR01DK055889 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI COX, NANCY J. · 1998 to 2004
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL56399NHLBI NIH HHS HL66533NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL056399NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL066533NIDCD NIH HHS DC04415NIDCD NIH HHS DC05210NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004415NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005210NIDDK NIH HHS DK55889NIDDK NIH HHS DK58026NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK055889NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058026NIGMS NIH HHS GM07197NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledGenome-wide linkage and association analyses were conducted to identify genetic determinants of stuttering in a founder population in which 48 individuals affected with stuttering are connected in a single 232-person genealogy. A novel approach was devised to account for all necessary relationships to enable multipoint linkage analysis. Regions with nominal evidence for linkage were found on chromosomes 3 (P=0.013, 208.8 centiMorgans (cM)), 13 (P=0.012, 52.6 cM), and 15 (P=0.02, 100 cM). Regions with nominal evidence for association with stuttering that overlapped with a linkage signal are located on chromosomes 3 (P=0.0047, 195 cM), 9 (P=0.0067, 46.5 cM), and 13 (P=0.0055, 52.6 cM). We also conducted the first meta-analysis for stuttering using results from linkage studies in the Hutterites and The Illinois International Genetics of Stuttering Project and identified regions with nominal evidence for linkage on chromosomes 2 (P=0.013, 180-195 cM) and 5 (P=0.0051, 105-120 cM; P=0.015, 120-135 cM). None of the linkage signals detected in the Hutterite sample alone, or in the meta-analysis, meet genome-wide criteria for significance, although some of the stronger signals overlap linkage mapping signals previously reported for other speech and language disorders. EDUCATIONAL

objectivesAfter reading this article, the reader will be able to: (1) summarize information about the background of common disorders and methodology of genetic studies; (2) evaluate the role of genetics in stuttering; (3) discuss the value of using founder populations in genetic studies; (4) articulate the importance of combining several studies in a meta-analysis; (5) discuss the overlap of genetic signals identified in stuttering with other speech and language disorders.

Indexed as

ChildChromosomes, Human, Pair 13Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3Genetic LinkageGenotypeHumansPedigreePopulation SurveillanceStuttering

Identifiers

PMID17276504
PMCPMC2128723
OpenAlexW2064253933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.