Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17274486›Full record

ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2006

G. Heiner Sell memorial lecture: neuronal plasticity after spinal cord injury: significance for present and future treatments.

Volker Dietz

Abstract readLecture
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Volker DietzSpinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland. Volker.Dietz@balgrist.ch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent progress in the understanding of movement control allows us to define more precisely the requirements for successful rehabilitation of patients with neurologic deficits after a spinal cord injury (SCI). Load- and hip joint position-related afferent input seems to be of crucial importance for the generation and success of locomotor training. In addition, there is accumulating evidence from animal experiments that axonal regeneration can be induced after a SCI. Consequently, in the near future, new therapeutic approaches will be developed for the treatment of subjects with SCI. Functional training and regeneration represent complimentary approaches. Regenerating spinal tract fibers needs functional training to make the appropriate connections, and training effects will be enhanced by regenerating fibers. A clinical basis for monitoring the effects of novel interventional therapies is needed. Refined and combined clinical and neurophysiologic measures are needed for a precise qualitative and quantitative assessment of spinal cord function in patients with SCI at an early stage. This is a basic requirement for predicting functional outcome, as well as for recognizing any improvement in the recovery of function caused by a new treatment. To this aim, 14 European spinal cord injury centers involved in the rehabilitation of patients with acute SCI have built a close clinical collaboration using a standardized protocol for the assessment of the outcome after SCI and the extent of recovery achieved by actually applied therapies in a larger population of patients with SCI.

Indexed as

HumansMotor ActivityNerve RegenerationNeuronal PlasticityNeurophysiologySpinal CordSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID17274486
PMCPMC1949033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.