Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17273974›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2007

Polymorphic variation in human meiotic recombination.

Vivian G Cheung, Joshua T Burdick, Deborah Hirschmann, Michael Morley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A rigorous measure of genome-wide genetic shuffling that takes into account crossover positions and Mendel's second law.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vivian G CheungDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. vcheung@mail.med.upenn.edu
Joshua T Burdick
Deborah Hirschmann
Michael Morley
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

IDENTITY BY DESCENT MAPPING USING MICROARRAYSR01HG001880 · NHGRI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI CHEUNG, VIVIAN G · 1999 to 2008
$2.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG001880NHGRI NIH HHS R01-HG01880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, our phenotype of interest is meiotic recombination. Using genotypes of approximately 6,000 SNP markers in members of the Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain Utah pedigrees, we found extensive individual variation in the number of female and male recombination events. The locations and frequencies of these recombination events vary along the genome. In both female and male meiosis, the regions with the most recombination events are found at the ends of the chromosomes. Our analysis also shows that there are polymorphic differences among individuals in the activity of the recombination "jungles"; these preferred sites of meiotic recombination differ greatly among individuals. These findings have important implications for understanding genetic disorders that result from improper chromosome segregation.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRecombination, GeneticChromosome MappingChromosome PairingChromosome SegregationChromosomes, HumanFemaleHumansMaleMeiosisPedigreeUtah

Identifiers

PMID17273974
PMCPMC1821106
OpenAlexW2149414420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.