Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17272669›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2007

Conditioned preference for sweet stimuli in OLETF rat: effects of food deprivation.

Bart C De Jonghe, Andras Hajnal, Mihai Covasa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hedonic and incentive signals for body weight control.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2011
    Review
  4. Gastric bypass surgery alters behavioral and neural taste functions for sweet taste in obese rats.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2010
    Article
  5. Parabrachial coding of sapid sucrose: relevance to reward and obesity.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2009
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Unraveling the obesity of OLETF rats.Physiology & behavior · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bart C De JongheDept of Nutritional Sciences, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State Univ, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Andras Hajnal
Mihai Covasa
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Dopamine mechanisms in development of type-2 diabetesR01DK065709 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI HAJNAL, ANDRAS · 2004 to 2008
$1.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK065709NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK065709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rat, an outbred strain of Long- Evans Tokushima Otsuka rat (LETO) that lacks CCK-1 receptor expression, is hyperphagic and develops obesity and type-2 diabetes. The present study sought to assess how OLETF rats alter intake, preference, and conditioned preference of palatable solutions after acute food deprivation. Our results show that after 24 h chow restriction, LETO rats increase both sucrose intake and two-bottle sucrose preference relative to their free-fed baseline, whereas OLETF rats do not increase sucrose intake (0.3 M or 1.0 M sucrose) or preference (1.0 M vs. 0.3 M sucrose) when they are food deprived. In contrast, OLETF rats exhibit a higher conditioned flavor preference when sucrose is used as unconditioned stimulus (US) relative to LETO rats, whether overnight food restricted (81% vs. 71% for OLETF and LETO rats, respectively) or free fed (82% vs. 54% for OLETF and LETO rats, respectively) during the test. When a noncaloric saccharin solution is used as US, OLETF rats show a higher preference for the saccharin-associated flavor relative to LETO rats when nondeprived (76% vs. 58% for OLETF and LETO rats, respectively); however, neither strain shows differential conditioned flavor preference for saccharin in the deprivation state during the test. These findings suggest that OLETF rats fail to integrate postabsorptive and orosensory effects of sucrose in a conditioning setting to influence intake. Thus, it appears that OLETF rats form preferences for sucrose based largely on orosensory and hedonic properties of the solution, rather than caloric value.

Indexed as

AnimalsConditioning, PsychologicalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFood DeprivationRatsRats, Inbred OLETFSaccharinSucroseSweetening AgentsTasteSaccharinSucroseSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID17272669
PMCPMC3594830
OpenAlexW2031425254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.