Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17268937›Full record

ArticlePharmacy world & science : PWS2007

The influence of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) on inappropriate prescribing in Australian nursing homes.

Michelle A King, Michael S Roberts

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Canadian list of essential medications: Potential and uncertainties.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017
    Article
  10. Estimated effects of adding universal public coverage of an essential medicines list to existing public drug plans in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prescribing of opioid analgesics and related mortality before and after the introduction of long-acting oxycodone.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle A KingDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Road, Aberdeen AB25 2AY, United Kingdom. michelle.king@abdn.ac.uk
Michael S Roberts
University of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing, defined by applying modified Beers' criteria, and to examine the influence of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), Australia's national scheme for subsidising medicines, on inappropriate prescribing.

methodsCross-sectional survey of nursing home records, including 7-days data from medication charts.

settingFiveteen randomly selected nursing homes (998 residents) in Southeast Queensland and Northern New South Wales, Australia.

main outcome measuresThe prevalence of inappropriate prescribing as defined by modified Beers' criteria and its correlation with PBS restrictions.

results18.5% of residents were ordered one or more inappropriate medications, and 1.5% of residents were ordered two or more. The level of PBS restriction and the percentage of residents ordered a medication were highly correlated (p = -0.87, P < 0.001). Medications in Beers' criteria that were not listed (subsidised) on the PBS were not ordered for any resident. PBS medicines with subsidies restricted to certain populations or indications were ordered for 0% to 0.1% of residents. Dextropropoxyphene, diazepam, amitriptyline and methyldopa were the only medications in Beers' criteria prescribed to more than 0.5% of residents. Dextropropoxyphene was only subsidised for war veterans, with a caution warning of its potential to cause drug dependence, while diazepam, amitriptyline and methyldopa were listed on the PBS without any subsidy restrictions.

conclusionIncreases in the level of PBS restriction were associated with decreases in the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing, The targeting of drug subsidies to reduce inappropriate prescribing warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Cost SharingFormularies as TopicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesDrug CostsDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationHealth PolicyHumansMedication ErrorsMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsNursing Homes

Identifiers

PMID17268937
OpenAlexW2157123101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.