Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17268839›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2007

Chironomids: suitable test organisms for risk assessment investigations on the potential endocrine disrupting properties of pesticides.

Verena Taenzler, Eric Bruns, Michael Dorgerloh, Verena Pfeifle, Lennart Weltje

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Toxics · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Endocrine disruption in aquatic systems: up-scaling research to address ecological consequences.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Endocrine disruption in aquatic insects: a review.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2007
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Verena TaenzlerDr. Knoell Consult GmbH, Bioplex Centre for Life Sciences, Marie-Curie-Strasse 8, 51377 Leverkusen, Germany. vtaenzler@dr-knoell-consult.com
Eric Bruns
Michael Dorgerloh
Verena Pfeifle
Lennart Weltje
Bayer (Germany) · DERobert Bosch (Germany) · DESyngenta (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate invertebrate assay has been a primary goal of national and international testing programs for endocrine disrupting chemicals. The available information on the endocrine system, its hormones and their modes of action in controlling physiological processes in invertebrates is limited and the selection of appropriate test species still presents a challenge. This paper outlines the development of a higher-tier full life cycle (FLC) test for pesticides with the non-biting midge Chironomus riparius (Insecta, Diptera, Chironomidae). As an insect, C. riparius represents the species' richest and ecologically one of the most important groups of invertebrates. In addition, the endocrine system of insects is one of the best studied among the invertebrates. Acute and chronic tests with Chironomus spp. are commonly used for testing and risk assessment of agrochemicals. A chironomid FLC test protocol has been developed and its suitability investigated in an inter-laboratory comparison. The protocol used is based on existing OECD and US-EPA test methods. To verify the suitability of the test to generate endpoints that encompass adverse effects on the arthropod endocrine system, a juvenile hormone analog was selected as positive control substance. Results have demonstrated that the proposed chironomid FLC can be performed in separate laboratories and that the selected arthropod juvenile hormone mimic causes effects. However, the observed toxicity is not proof of an endocrine disruptive mechanism and could equally be evoked by other compounds. Contrary to a screening assay, which aims at revealing a substance's mode-of-action, the FLC test generates robust, population-relevant endpoints that can be used in the risk assessment of agrochemicals. Since the initial results presented in this paper are encouraging we propose to complete the validation of this assay under OECD with high priority.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsChironomidaeChlorophenolsEndocrine DisruptorsFemaleLife Cycle StagesMaleNo-Observed-Adverse-Effect LevelPesticidesReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentToxicity Tests, Chronic3,5-dichlorophenolChlorophenolsEndocrine DisruptorsPesticides

Identifiers

PMID17268839
OpenAlexW2046926121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.