Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17268506›Full record

ReviewEMBO reports2007

A common topology for bacterial and eukaryotic transcription initiation?

Andrew Travers, Georgi Muskhelishvili

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EMBO reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular models of bidirectional promoter regulation.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Non-canonical DNA structures in the human ribosomal DNA.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. DNA Supercoiling: an Ancestral Regulator of Gene Expression in Pathogenic Bacteria?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. HU ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew TraversMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK. aat@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
Georgi Muskhelishvili

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105184288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA supercoiling is a major regulator of transcription in bacteria. Negative supercoiling acts both by promoting the formation of nucleoprotein structures containing wrapped DNA and by altering the twist of DNA. The latter affects the initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase as well as recombination processes. Here, we argue that although bacteria and eukaryotes differ in their mode of packaging DNA supercoils, increases in DNA twist are associated with chromatin folding and transcriptional silencing in both. Conversely, decreases in DNA twist are associated with chromatin unfolding and the acquisition of transcriptional competence. In other words, at the most fundamental level, the principles of genetic regulation are common to all organisms. The apparent differences in the details of regulation probably represent alternative methods of fine-tuning similar underlying processes.

Indexed as

BacteriaCell NucleusChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA, SuperhelicalGene Expression RegulationModels, GeneticTranscription, GeneticDNA, Superhelical

Identifiers

PMID17268506
PMCPMC1796767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.