ArticleImplementation science : IS2007
Improving quality of care through routine, successful implementation of evidence-based practice at the bedside: an organizational case study protocol using the Pettigrew and Whipp model of strategic change.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cash and voucher assistance along humanitarian supply chains: a literature review and directions for future research.Disasters · 2023Pooled it
- Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures.Implementation science : IS · 2013Pooled it
- Implementation factors and their effect on e-Health service adoption in rural communities: a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2013Pooled it
- Juvenile probation officers' perceptions on youth substance use varies from task-shifting to family-based contingency management.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2021Trial
- A pragmatic cluster randomised trial evaluating three implementation interventions.Implementation science : IS · 2012Trial
- A scoping review of theories, models and frameworks used or proposed to evaluate knowledge mobilization strategies.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Formative Evaluation of the Implementation of eHealth in the Philippines: A Qualitative Study.Acta medica Philippina · 2024Article
- Teaching evidence-based practice to physiotherapy students in Italy: a cross sectional study.Archives of physiotherapy · 2023Article
- Rates, Barriers, and Facilitators of Outcome Collection on Hand Surgery Outreach to Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Data Use for Decision Making: The Experience of the African Health Initiative Partnerships in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Mozambique.Global health, science and practice · 2022Article
- A competence improvement programme for the systematic observation of frail older patients in homecare: qualitative outcome analysis.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Experiences of nurse managers and practitioners on implementation of an evidence-based practice intervention.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2022Article
- The use of the PARIHS framework in implementation research and practice-a citation analysis of the literature.Implementation science : IS · 2020Review
- Developing a comprehensive definition of sustainability.Implementation science : IS · 2017Article
- Implementation of evidence-based rehabilitation for non-specific back pain and common mental health problems: a process evaluation of a nationwide initiative.BMC health services research · 2015Article
- What impedes and what facilitates a quality improvement project for older hospitalized patients?International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2014Article
- Why a successful task substitution in glaucoma care could not be transferred from a hospital setting to a primary care setting: a qualitative study.Implementation science : IS · 2013Article
- Peri-operative nurses' knowledge and reported practice of pressure injury risk assessment and prevention: A before-after intervention study.BMC nursing · 2012Article
- The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research.Implementation science : IS · 2012Review
- Understanding the context of balanced scorecard implementation: a hospital-based case study in Pakistan.Implementation science : IS · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based practice (EBP) is an expected approach to improving the quality of patient care and service delivery in health care systems internationally that is yet to be realized. Given the current evidence-practice gap, numerous authors describe barriers to achieving EBP. One recurrently identified barrier is the setting or context of practice, which is likewise cited as a potential part of the solution to the gap. The purpose of this study is to identify key contextual elements and related strategic processes in organizations that find and use evidence at multiple levels, in an ongoing, integrated fashion, in contrast to those that do not.
methodsThe core theoretical framework for this multi-method explanatory case study is Pettigrew and Whipp's Content, Context, and Process model of strategic change. This framework focuses data collection on three entities: the Why of strategic change, the What of strategic change, and the How of strategic change, in this case related to implementation and normalization of EBP. The data collection plan, designed to capture relevant organizational context and related outcomes, focuses on eight interrelated factors said to characterize a receptive context. Selective, purposive sampling will provide contrasting results between two cases (departments of nursing) and three embedded units in each. Data collection methods will include quantitative tools (e.g., regarding culture) and qualitative approaches including focus groups, interviews, and documents review (e.g., regarding integration and "success") relevant to the EBP initiative. DISCUSSION: This study should provide information regarding contextual elements and related strategic processes key to successful implementation and sustainability of EBP, specifically in terms of a pervasive pattern in an acute care hospital-based health care setting. Additionally, this study will identify key contextual elements that differentiate successful implementation and sustainability of EBP efforts, both within varying levels of a hospital-based clinical setting and across similar hospital settings interested in EBP.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.