Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17266393›Full record

ArticleAlternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA2006

The principles of weight of evidence validation of test methods and testing strategies. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 58.

Michael Balls, Patric Amcoff, Susanne Bremer, Silvia Casati, Sandra Coecke, Richard Clothier, Robert Combes, Raffaella Corvi, Rodger Curren, Chantra Eskes and 13 more

Abstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2010
    Article
  9. A toxicology for the 21st century--mapping the road ahead.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2009
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Validating and troubleshooting ocular in vitro toxicology tests.Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Michael BallsFRAME, Russell & Burch House, 96-98 North Sherwood Street, Nottingham, NG1 4EE, UK. michael.balls@btopenworld.com
Patric Amcoff
Susanne Bremer
Silvia Casati
Sandra Coecke
Richard Clothier
Robert Combes
Raffaella Corvi
Rodger Curren
Chantra Eskes
Julia Fentem
Laura Gribaldo
Marlies Halder
Thomas Hartung
Sebastian Hoffmann
Leonard Schectman
Laurie Scott
Horst Spielmann
William Stokes
Raymond Tice
Drew Wagner
Valérie Zuang
ECVAM

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 ES999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Animal Testing AlternativesPeer ReviewPredictive Value of TestsQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsToxicity TestsUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID17266393
PMCPMC2709979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.