Trial reportDer Anaesthesist2007
[Vasopressin for therapy of persistent traumatic hemorrhagic shock: The VITRIS.at study].
Trial report in Der Anaesthesist, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Vasopressors for hypotensive shock.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Vasopressin in hemorrhagic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized animal trials.BioMed research international · 2014Pooled it
- [Preclinical management of multiples injuries: S3 guideline].Der Unfallchirurg · 2012Guideline
- The impact of early administration of vasopressor agents for the resuscitation of severe hemorrhagic shock following blunt trauma.BMC emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- [Future of emergency medicine in Germany 2.0].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Review
- Anesthesia in swine : optimizing a laboratory model to optimize translational research.Der Anaesthesist · 2015Review
- [Out-of-hospital emergency medicine in Germany, Austria and Switzerland : randomized prospective studies from 1990 to 2012].Der Anaesthesist · 2014Article
- Article
- [Comments on the 2010 guidelines on cardiopulmonary resuscitation of the European Resuscitation Council].Der Anaesthesist · 2010Article
- Comment on Grmec et al.: a treatment protocol including vasopressin and hydroxyethyl starch solution is associated with increased rate of return of spontaneous circulation in blunt trauma patients with pulseless electrical activity.International journal of emergency medicine · 2009Article
- Bench-to-bedside review: latest results in hemorrhagic shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While fluid management is established in controlled hemorrhagic shock, its use in uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock is being controversially discussed, because it may worsen bleeding. In the irreversible phase of hemorrhagic shock that was unresponsive to volume replacement, airway management and catecholamines, vasopressin was beneficial due to an increase in arterial blood pressure, shift of blood away from a subdiaphragmatic bleeding site towards the heart and brain and decrease of fluid resuscitation requirements. The purpose of this multicenter, randomized, controlled, international trial is to assess the effects of vasopressin (10 IU IV) vs. saline placebo IV (up to 3 injections at least 5 min apart) in patients with prehospital traumatic hemorrhagic shock that persists despite standard shock treatment. The study will be carried out by helicopter emergency medical service teams in Austria, Germany, Czech Republic, Portugal, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Inclusion criteria are adult trauma patients with presumed traumatic hemorrhagic shock (systolic arterial blood pressure <90 mmHg) that does not respond to the first 10 min of standard shock treatment (endotracheal intubation, fluid resuscitation and use of vasopressors) after arrival of the first emergency physician at the scene. The time window for randomization will close after 30 min of shock treatment. Exclusion criteria are terminal illness, no intravenous access, age <18 years, injury >60 min before randomization, cardiac arrest before randomization, presence of a do-not-resuscitate order, untreated tension pneumothorax, untreated cardiac tamponade, or known pregnancy. Primary study end-point is the hospital admission rate, secondary end-points are hemodynamic variables, fluid resuscitation requirements and hospital discharge rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.