ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2007
[Rehabilitation of non-specific low back pain. Results of a multidisciplinary in-patient program].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- [Mild whole body hyperthermia in combination with inpatient multimodal oriented pain therapy: evaluation in patients with chronic unspecific lumbar back pain].Der Orthopade · 2014Trial
- [The Mainz Pain Staging System is also suitable for grading chronic pain in inpatient geriatric patients].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2020Article
- [Back pain. Many questions and still too few answers].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study we documented the effectiveness of a 3-week multidisciplinary rehabilitative intervention in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. We compared the therapy group (136 patients: 91 female, 45 male) with a waiting list control group (34 patients: 25 female, 9 male). The patients showed chronic pain grades 1 and 2 (according to the Mainz Pain Staging System) and mild restriction of activity. Pain intensity, activity, participation, and health-related quality of life improved significantly in the intervention group (VAS from 46.34 to 25.91; FFbH-R from 19.79 to 18; PDI from 21.02 to 14.57; NHP from 161.83 to 120.97); the waiting list control group remained unchanged. The improvement was independent of age, gender, duration of disease, work status, or workplace satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.