Trial reportJournal of endocrinological investigation2006
Long-term GH treatment of GH-deficient adults: comparison between one and two daily injections.
Trial report in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-acting growth hormone.Paediatric drugs · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The physiological pulsatile secretion of GH in humans might be important for the metabolic effects of GH. In the treatment of GH-deficient (GHD) patients, the most common regimen is a single sc injection at bedtime. It has not been completely established if this is the optimal mode of GH administration during long-term GH treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the metabolic effects of two different GH replacement regimens comparing one to two daily injections. Eight men and six women, 42-78 yr old, with verified severe GHD, participated. Patients were matched for gender, age and body mass index (BMI) and were randomized to GH therapy (one or two injections daily) for 12 months. GH doses were individually titrated to IGF-I levels of age-matched controls. IGF-I, glucose, insulin, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoproteins, including size fractionation with fast performance liquid chromatography, BMI and body composition were analyzed. After 12 months the median GH dose was 0.45 mg (range 0.25-0.50 mg) in both groups. Body fat had decreased by 20% (p<0.05) in the group receiving one daily GH injection. There were no differences between the two treatment groups in indices of carbohydrate or lipid metabolism. The administration of GH divided into two daily doses offered no major advantage as compared to the more convenient single injection in the evening. The GH-induced reduction in body fat occurred independently from changes in serum lipids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.