Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17253884›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2007

Efavirenz and nevirapine in HIV-1 infection : is there a role for clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring?

Karen Dahri, Mary H H Ensom

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Limited-sampling strategies for anti-infective agents: systematic review.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2009
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen DahriFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mary H H Ensom
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nevirapine and efavirenz are nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors used in antiretroviral regimens to treat HIV infection. Therapeutic drug monitoring in patients on antiretroviral regimens that include these agents has been suggested to be beneficial in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Various analytical methods are available to quantify nevirapine and efavirenz concentrations. A previously published, nine-step, decision-making algorithm has been used to evaluate the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of efavirenz and nevirapine. A relationship has been found between efavirenz concentrations and toxicity and between nevirapine concentrations and virological efficacy. For efavirenz, the recommended therapeutic range is 1-4 mg/L; for nevirapine, minimum trough concentrations of >3.4 mg/L have been suggested. Both drugs have demonstrated interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. The pharmacokinetic parameters of nevirapine vary in female patients, patients coinfected with hepatitis B virus, and patients from different geographical locations. The pharmacokinetic parameters of efavirenz have also been shown to vary depending on patients' race, baseline bilirubin level, and geographical location. Drug interactions and resistance mutations can also be confounders in the pharmacokinetic parameters of these drugs. Coinfection with hepatitis C can also contribute to increased drug concentrations. The risk of hepatotoxicity can be increased in the presence of elevated nevirapine concentrations. As patients with HIV-1 infection will be managed with different combinations of antiretroviral regimens over the course of their lives, the limitations of having only four drug classes from which to choose make it even more important to maximise the usefulness of each of these drug classes. The available evidence suggests that therapeutic drug monitoring of efavirenz and nevirapine may contribute to the clinician's ability to evaluate efficacy and safety in patients taking these drugs. Patients at risk of toxicity from drug interactions or disease interactions and patients who may be noncompliant may gain the greatest benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring of efavirenz and nevirapine.

Indexed as

HIV-1AlgorithmsAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryCyclopropanesDecision Support TechniquesDrug InteractionsDrug MonitoringDrug Resistance, ViralHIV InfectionsHumansNevirapineOxazinesPatient SelectionAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesefavirenzNevirapineOxazinesReverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID17253884
OpenAlexW178626500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.