SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Non-pharmacological interventions for wandering of people with dementia in the domestic setting.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-pharmacological interventions for wandering of people with dementia in the domestic setting.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007Pooled it
- Factors Influencing the Implementation of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Residential Aged-Care Homes: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: A systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2025Review
- Identifying adoption and usability factors of locator devices for persons living with dementia.Dementia (London, England) · 2022Article
- Immersive Virtual Reality Reminiscence Reduces Anxiety in the Oldest-Old Without Causing Serious Side Effects: A Single-Center, Pilot, and Randomized Crossover Study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Non-pharmacological interventions for patients with dementia: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Article
- A Systematic Review of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Moderate to Severe Dementia: A Study Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Psychiatry investigation · 2018Article
- What do we know about strategies to manage dementia-related wandering? A scoping review.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Article
- Formulation of evidence-based messages to promote the use of physical activity to prevent and manage Alzheimer's disease.BMC public health · 2017Article
- The use of global positional satellite location in dementia: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2014Article
- Conditions associated with wandering in people with dementia from the viewpoint of self-awareness: five case reports.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias · 2012Article
- An update on the diagnosis and management of dementing conditions.Reviews in neurological diseases · 2011Review
- Treatment Indications in Clinical Practice and Applied Research on Psychosocial Interventions for People With Dementia.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasReview
- What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicinaReview
- A framework for managing wandering and preventing elopement.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
- The Assessments of Music Therapy for Dementia Based on the Cochrane Review.Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extraReview
- An Integrative Review of the Feasibility and Effects of the Use of Location-Tracking Devices by Persons Living With Cognitive Impairment.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA number of studies exist of interventions for wandering in the institutional setting, but much less work has been done on wandering in the domestic setting. The prevalence of wandering by people with dementia is difficult to assess; wandering is not a simple or static behaviour and the reasons why people wander remain unclear. In the absence of a theory of wandering and an agreed definition of wandering, it is difficult to discover effective strategies for managing wandering and difficult to design appropriate intervention strategies. Also, the same behaviour or type of wandering might occur for different reasons in different individuals; any theoretical formulation is going to have to allow for different triggers for the behaviour and so to get a 'one size fits all' kind of explanation is unlikely. Thus what we mostly encounter in this field is a 'trial and error' approach which does not always do justice to the complex interactions of personal and environmental factors that lead people with dementia to wander. While there seems to be a consensus in the literature that in the majority of cases non-pharmacological approaches may work as well as drug treatment and with fewer side effects, in practice clinicians often resort to drugs as the first line of treatment. This review reports the lack of evidence from RCTs and discusses the range of non-pharmacological interventions that have been carried out using other study designs.
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing wandering in the domestic setting by people with dementia. The secondary objective is to highlight the quality and quantity of research evidence available and to set an agenda for future research. SEARCH STRATEGY: The trials were identified from a search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group on 11 May 2006 using the terms exit* or wander* or elopement or ambulat* or walk*. This Register contains records from all major healthcare databases and many ongoing trial databases and is updated regularly. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing intervention with no intervention or usual treatment ('standard care') or another intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No suitable trials of non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention and management of wandering in the domestic setting were found. MAIN
resultsAs no randomised controlled trials were found, no results can be reported. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is an urgent need for randomised controlled trials of non-pharmacological interventions for wandering in the domestic setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.