SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2012Pooled it
- Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2011Pooled it
- Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is preferred for selected elderly individuals with choledocholithiasis.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2023Article
- Obstructive lithiasis of the lower bile duct discovered four decades after cholecystectomy and its management by ideal choledochotomy: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2023Article
- Intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage over primary closure of the common bile duct for choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis: a cohort study of 211 cases.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Appropriate Patient Selection Is Essential for the Success of Primary Closure After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2017Article
- Spontaneously removed biliary stent drainage versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.Medicine · 2016Observational
- Results of Medium Seventeen Years' Follow-Up after Laparoscopic Choledochotomy for Ductal Stones.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2016Article
- Results of treatment of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi by single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2014Article
- Laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy followed by primary duct closure is feasible and safe for the treatment of choledocholithiasis.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Article
- Does the surgeon's experience influence the outcome of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones?Surgical endoscopy · 2013Article
- Treatment of common bile duct stones in Sweden 1989-2006: an observational nationwide study of a paradigm shift.World journal of surgery · 2012Article
- Primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy.World journal of surgery · 2012Article
- A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Article
- Laparoscopic CBD Exploration.The Indian journal of surgery · 2010Article
- Spontaneously removed endobiliary J stent drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.Surgical endoscopy · 2009Article
- Primary closure of choledochotomy after emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.Surgical endoscopy · 2008Article
- Laparoscopic T-tube choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsReview
- Application of an internal drainage tube in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUse of T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is controversial. We were unable to identify any meta-analysis or systematic reviews of the benefits and harms of T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration.
objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of routine primary closure versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until January 2006. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered for inclusion all randomised clinical trials comparing primary closure (with or without a biliary stent) versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We collected the data on the characteristics, methodological quality, mortality, morbidity, operating time, and hospital stay from the one identified trial. We analysed the data using the fixed-effect model using RevMan Analysis. For each outcome we calculated the odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals based on intention-to-treat analysis. MAIN
resultsWe included one trial with 55 patients randomised: 27 to the primary closure and 28 to the T-tube group. This trial was of inadequate methodological quality. There was no mortality in either group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for any of the outcomes except for the hospital stay (WMD -2.8 days, 95% CI -1.93 to -3.67), which was lower in the primary closure group. AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe have insufficient evidence to recommend T-tube drainage over primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration or vice versa. Further randomised trials are necessary to assess the benefits and harms of T-tube drainage compared with primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.