Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17253563›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Wound drains after incisional hernia repair.

K S Gurusamy, K Samraj

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Do we really need routine drainage after laparoscopic adrenalectomy and splenectomy?Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. [Incisional hernia - how do I do it? Standard surgical approach].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K S GurusamyRoyal Free Hospital, General Surgery, Pond Street, London, UK, NW3 2QG. kurinchi2k@hotmail.com
K Samraj
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncisional hernias are caused by the failure of the wall of the abdomen to close after abdominal surgery, leaving a hole through which the viscera protrude. Incisional hernias are repaired by further surgery. Surgical drains are frequently inserted during hernia repair with the aim of facilitating fluid drainage and preventing complications. Traditional teaching has recommended the use of drains after incisional hernia repair other than for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. More than 50% of open mesh repairs of ventral hernias have drains inserted. However, there is uncertainty as to whether drains are associated with benefits or harms to the patient.

objectivesTo determine the effects on wound infection and other outcomes, of inserting a wound drain during surgery to repair incisional hernias, and, if possible, to determine the comparative effects of different types of wound drain after incisional hernia repair. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (last searched March 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)(The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2006), EMBASE (1974 to March 2006), PubMed (1951 to March 2006), and Science Citation Index Expanded (1974 to March 2006). We also searched the meta-register of controlled trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered all randomised trials performed in adult patients who underwent incisional hernia repair and that compared using a drain with no drain. We also considered trials that compared different types of drain. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data on the characteristics of the trial, methodological quality of the trials, outcomes (e.g. infection and other wound complications) from each trial. For each outcome we calculated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and based on intention-to-treat analysis. MAIN

resultsOnly one trial was eligible for inclusion in the review with a total of 24 patients randomised to an electrified drain (12 patients) compared with a corrugated drain (12 patients). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for any of the outcomes (a variety of measures of infection). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to determine whether wound drains after incisional hernia repair are associated with better or worse outcomes than no drains.

Indexed as

DrainageHernia, VentralHumansReoperationSurgical MeshSurgical Wound Infection

Identifiers

PMID17253563
OpenAlexW4250422460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.