Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17253553›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Surgery for scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

D K L Cheuk, V Wong, E Wraige, P Baxter, A Cole, T N'Diaye, V Mayowe

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgery for scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of complications in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: a literature meta-analysis from the past 15 years.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

D K L CheukUniversity of Hong Kong, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China. cheukkl@hkusua.hku.hk
V Wong
E Wraige
P Baxter
A Cole
T N'Diaye
V Mayowe
Queen Mary Hospital · CNSheffield Children's Hospital · GBSheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScoliosis in people with Duchenne muscular dystrophy is usually progressive and treated with surgery. However, it is unclear whether the existing evidence is sufficiently scientifically rigorous to support a recommendation for spinal surgery for most people with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and scoliosis.

objectivesThe objectives of this systematic review were to determine the effectiveness and safety of spinal surgery in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients with scoliosis. We intended to test whether spinal surgery is effective in increasing life expectancy, improving respiratory function, improving quality of life and overall functioning; and whether spinal surgery is associated with severe adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the specialized registers of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group and Cochrane Back Group, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 2006), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January 2006), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2006), Dissertation Abstracts International (1861 to Jan 2006), CINAHL (January 1982 to January 2006), and the National Institute of Health Clinical Trials Database (January 2006). No language restrictions were imposed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled clinical trials using random or quasi-random allocation of treatment evaluating all forms of spinal surgery for scoliosis in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy were to be included in the review. The control interventions would have been no treatment, non-operative treatment, or a different form of spinal surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors examined the search results and evaluated the study characteristics against inclusion criteria to decide which ones would be included in the review. MAIN

resultsA total of 402 studies were identified from electronic searching. Thirty-six studies were relevant but none met the inclusion criteria for the review, because they were not clinical trials but prospective or retrospective reviews of case series. AUTHORS'

conclusionsSince there were no randomized controlled clinical trials available to evaluate the effectiveness of scoliosis surgery in people with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, no evidence-based recommendation can be made for clinical practice. Patients should be informed about the uncertainty of benefits and potential risks of surgery for scoliosis. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the effectiveness of scoliosis surgery, in terms of patients' quality of life, functional status, respiratory function and life expectancy.

Indexed as

HumansMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneScoliosisSpine

Identifiers

PMID17253553
OpenAlexW4232585777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.