Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17253507›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Diuretics for preventing pre-eclampsia.

D Churchill, G D G Beevers, S Meher, C Rhodes

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Guideline
  4. Guided imagery for treating hypertension in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Gordon's syndrome in pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2023
    Review
  12. Toward personalized management of chronic hypertension in pregnancy.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Review
  13. Hypertension in Women Across the Lifespan.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Hypomagnesaemia and pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Treating Hypertension in Pregnancy.Current hypertension reports · 2015
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Women, kidney disease, and pregnancy.Advances in chronic kidney disease · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

D ChurchillRoyal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, New Cross Hospital, Wednesfield, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, UK, WV10 0QP. david.churchill@rwh-tr.nhs.uk
G D G Beevers
S Meher
C Rhodes
Birmingham City Hospital · GBGood Hope Hospital · GBLiverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiuretics are used to reduce blood pressure and oedema in non-pregnant individuals. Formerly, they were used in pregnancy with the aim of preventing or delaying the development of pre-eclampsia. This practice became controversial when concerns were raised that diuretics may further reduce plasma volume in women with pre-eclampsia, thereby increasing the risk of adverse effects on the mother and baby, particularly fetal growth.

objectivesTo assess the effects of diuretics on prevention of pre-eclampsia and its complications. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (April 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 2) and EMBASE (2002 to April 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials evaluating the effects of diuretics for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. We analysed and double checked data for accuracy. MAIN

resultsFive studies (1836 women) were included. All were of uncertain quality. The studies compared thiazide diuretics with either placebo or no intervention. There were no clear differences between the diuretic and control groups for any reported pregnancy outcomes including pre-eclampsia (four trials, 1391 women; relative risk (RR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 1.03), perinatal death (five trials,1836 women; RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.27), and preterm birth (two trials, 465 women; RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.41). There were no small-for-gestational age babies in the one trial that reported this outcome, and there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate any clear differences between the two groups for birthweight (one trial, 20 women; weighted mean difference 139 grams, 95% CI -484.40 to 762.40). Thiazide diuretics were associated with an increased risk of nausea and vomiting (two trials, 1217 women; RR 5.81, 95% CI 1.04 to 32.46), and women allocated diuretics were more likely to stop treatment due to side-effects compared to those allocated placebo (two trials, 1217 women; RR 1.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 4.22). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to draw reliable conclusions about the effects of diuretics on prevention of pre-eclampsia and its complications. However, from this review, no clear benefits have been found from the use of diuretics to prevent pre-eclampsia. Taken together with the level of adverse effects found, the use of diuretics for the prevention of pre-eclampsia and its complications cannot be recommended.

Indexed as

DiureticsFemaleHumansPre-EclampsiaPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDiuretics

Identifiers

PMID17253507
PMCPMC8826571
OpenAlexW1838492215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.