Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17253478›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Antihypertensive drug therapy for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy.

E Abalos, L Duley, D W Steyn, D J Henderson-Smart

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03449277 (Oral Nifedipine Versus Labetalol in Treatment of Postpartum Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 21 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03449277 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Oral Nifedipine Versus Labetalol in Treatment of Postpartum Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorHossam Ahmed Abd EllahRan2018 to 2019Enrolled100ConditionsPostpartum PreeclampsiaArmsOral Tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 262 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Concordance of effects of medical interventions on hospital admission and readmission rates with effects on mortality.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Pooled it
  7. Drugs for treatment of very high blood pressure during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  8. Prevention and treatment of postpartum hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  12. Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  13. Magnesium sulphate versus phenytoin for eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  14. Magnesium sulphate versus lytic cocktail for eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. ASH position paper: hypertension in pregnancy.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2009
    Guideline
  18. Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of pre-eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  19. Bed rest with or without hospitalisation for hypertension during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005
    Pooled it
  20. Interventions for treating placental abruption.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003
    Pooled it

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

E AbalosCentro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Pueyrredon 985, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina, 2000. crep@crep.com.ar
L Duley
D W Steyn
D J Henderson-Smart
Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales · ARStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council G116/98
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy is common. Antihypertensive drugs are often used in the belief that lowering blood pressure will prevent progression to more severe disease, and thereby improve outcome.

objectivesTo assess the effects of antihypertensive drug treatments for women with mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (March 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2005), LILACS (1984 to November 2005) and EMBASE (1974 to November 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised trials evaluating any antihypertensive drug treatment for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy defined, whenever possible, as systolic blood pressure 140 to 169 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure 90 to 109 mmHg. Comparisons were of one or more antihypertensive drug(s) with placebo, with no antihypertensive drug, or with another antihypertensive drug, and where treatment was planned to continue for at least seven days. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data. MAIN

resultsForty-six trials (4282 women) were included. Twenty-eight trials compared an antihypertensive drug with placebo/no antihypertensive drug (3200 women). There is a halving in the risk of developing severe hypertension associated with the use of antihypertensive drug(s) (19 trials, 2409 women; relative risk (RR) 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 0.61; risk difference (RD) -0.10 (-0.12 to -0.07); number needed to treat (NNT) 10 (8 to 13)) but little evidence of a difference in the risk of pre-eclampsia (22 trials, 2702 women; RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.13). Similarly, there is no clear effect on the risk of the baby dying (26 trials, 3081 women; RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.08), preterm birth (14 trials, 1992 women; RR 1.02; 95 % CI 0.89 to 1.16), or small-for-gestational-age babies (19 trials, 2437 women; RR 1.04; 95 % CI 0.84 to 1.27). There were no clear differences in any other outcomes. Nineteen trials (1282 women) compared one antihypertensive drug with another. Beta blockers seem better than methyldopa for reducing the risk of severe hypertension (10 trials, 539 women, RR 0.75 (95 % CI 0.59 to 0.94); RD -0.08 (-0.14 to 0.02); NNT 12 (6 to 275)). There is no clear difference between any of the alternative drugs in the risk of developing proteinuria/pre-eclampsia. Other outcomes were only reported by a small proportion of studies, and there were no clear differences. AUTHORS'

conclusionsIt remains unclear whether antihypertensive drug therapy for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy is worthwhile.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsFemaleHumansHypertensionPlacebo EffectPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID17253478
OpenAlexW4251795680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.