Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17253474›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Amphetamines for improving recovery after stroke.

L Martinsson, H Hårdemark, S Eksborg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02386475 (Effect of Serotonin and Levodopa Functional Recovery in Patients With Cerebral Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02386475 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Serotonin and Levodopa Functional Recovery in Patients With Cerebral Infarction

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital de GranollersRan2015 to 2019Enrolled39ConditionsStrokeArmsplacebo, citalopram, sinemet plus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of amphetamines on blood pressure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Vasoactive drugs for acute stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Genetics as a molecular window into recovery, its treatment, and stress responses after stroke.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2016
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L MartinssonAstraZeneca, R&D Södertälje, Study Delivery II, Södertälje, Sweden, SE-151 85. louise.martinsson@astrazeneca.com
H Hårdemark
S Eksborg
AstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal research shows that treatment with amphetamines improves recovery after focal cerebral ischaemia. If the effects are similar in humans, amphetamine treatment could have a major impact on recovery from stroke.

objectivesTo assess the effects of amphetamine treatment in patients with stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched January 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2006), EMBASE (1980 to January 2006), CINAHL (1982 to January 2006), CINAHL (1982 to January 2006), Science Citation Index (1992 to March 2005) and registers of ongoing trials. We also checked the reference lists of all relevant articles and reviews, and contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized unconfounded trials comparing amphetamine with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and assessed trial quality; one extracted the data. MAIN

resultsTen studies involving 287 patients were included, but not all trials contributed data to each outcome examined in this review. The quality of the trials varied but was generally high. Based on three trials (106 patients) there was no evidence that amphetamine treatment reduced death or dependence (Peto's odds ratio (Peto OR) 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6 to 3.3). Imbalances at baseline with more serious stroke allocated to amphetamine may account for the trend for more deaths at the end of follow up among amphetamine-allocated patients (Peto OR 2.8, 95% CI 0.9 to 8.6). Based on two trials (73 patients) systolic (weighted mean difference (WMD) 8.4 mm Hg, 95% CI 1.6 to 15.2) and diastolic (WMD 4.9 mm Hg, 95% CI 1.1 to 8.8) blood pressure, as well as heart rate, increased (WMD 10.6 bpm, 95% CI 3.3 to 17.8) in amphetamine-allocated patients. Based on six studies (176 patients) there was evidence of a better relative change from baseline to last follow up in motor function (WMD -6.1 points; 95% CI -10.4 to -1.9) Different results with different analysis approaches emphasize caution in the interpretation of the results. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAt present, too few patients have been studied to draw any definite conclusions about the effects of amphetamine treatment on recovery from stroke. The suggested benefits on motor function and the non-significant trend towards increased risk of death could be related to imbalances in prognostic variables or other bias in the studies. Further research is therefore justified.

Indexed as

AmphetaminesBrain IschemiaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeAmphetamines

Identifiers

PMID17253474
PMCPMC12278358
OpenAlexW1957042317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.