Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17253459›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Corticosteroids for treating optic neuritis.

S S Vedula, S Brodney-Folse, R L Gal, R Beck

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Corticosteroids for treating optic neuritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Corticosteroids for treating optic neuritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Glucocorticoid-dependent multiple sclerosis overlapping anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a case report and literature review update.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Steroids for optic nerve diseases?].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S S Vedula
S Brodney-Folse
R L Gal
R Beck
Jaeb Center for Health Research · USBlue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness Research & the Cochrane Eyes & Vision GroupU01EY020522 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DICKERSIN, KAY · 2010 to 2016
$9.2M
COCHRANE EYE AND VISION GROUP-COORDINATING RESOURCE CENTER-260021003N01EY021003 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DICKERSIN, KAY · 2006 to 2006
–
NEI NIH HHS N01 EY021003NEI NIH HHS U01 EY020522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptic neuritis is an inflammatory disease of the optic nerve. It occurs more commonly in women than in men. Usually presenting with an abrupt loss of vision, recovery of vision is almost never complete. Closely linked in pathogenesis to multiple sclerosis, it may be the initial manifestation for this condition. In certain patients, no underlying cause can be found.

objectivesTo assess the effects of corticosteroids on visual recovery of patients with acute optic neuritis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2005), EMBASE (1980 to January 2006), NNR (issue 4, 2006), LILACS and reference lists of identified trial reports. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized trials that evaluated corticosteroids, in any form, dose or route of administration, in people with acute optic neuritis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted the data on methodological quality and outcomes for analysis. MAIN

resultsWe included five randomized trials which included a total of 729 participants. Two trials evaluated low dose oral corticosteroids and two trials evaluated a higher dose of intravenous corticosteroids. One three-arm trial evaluated low-dose oral corticosteroids and high-dose intravenous corticosteroids against placebo. Trials evaluating oral corticosteroids compared varying doses of corticosteroids with placebo. Hence, we did not conduct a meta-analysis of such trials. In a meta-analysis of trials evaluating corticosteroids with total dose greater than 3000 mg administered intravenously, the relative risk of normal visual acuity with intravenous corticosteroids compared with placebo was 1.06 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.27) at six months and 1.06 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.22) at one year. The risk ratio of normal contrast sensitivity for the same comparison was 1.10 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.32) at six months follow up. We did not conduct a meta-analysis for this outcome at one year follow up since there was substantial statistical heterogeneity. The risk ratio of normal visual field for this comparison was 1.08 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.22) at six months and 1.02 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.20) at one year. Quality of life was assessed and reported in one trial. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is no conclusive evidence of benefit in terms of recovery to normal visual acuity, visual field or contrast sensitivity with either intravenous or oral corticosteroids at the doses evaluated in trials included in this review.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesContrast SensitivityHumansOptic NeuritisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVisual AcuityAdrenal Cortex Hormones

Identifiers

PMID17253459
PMCPMC4367867
OpenAlexW4256135049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.