Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17253455›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Support for breastfeeding mothers.

C Britton, F M McCormick, M J Renfrew, A Wade, S E King

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 162 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00966719 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of a Breastfeeding Support Intervention on Breastfeeding Duration in Jaundiced Infants Admitted to a Tertiary Care Centre: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioRan2009 to 2013Enrolled99ConditionsJaundice, BreastfeedingArmsLactation Consultant support
NCT03676608 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Study of Health Education to Improve Adherence to Breastfeeding in Primiparous Women Through the Use of Bee Wax Mammary Areolae

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlicanteRan2018 to 2019Enrolled240ConditionsBreastfeedingArmsBee Wax Mammary Areolae, Usual educational care
NCT06751186 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of 'Teté Dance' on the Duration of the Lactation Session in Irritable Infants in Peru: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCrianzamorRan2022 to 2023Enrolled150ConditionsBreastfeeding Duration, Infant Feeding PracticesArmsTeté Dance Guided Support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 569 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Antenatal breastfeeding education for increasing breastfeeding duration.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  14. Antenatal breastfeeding education for increasing breastfeeding duration.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Treatments for breast engorgement during lactation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  17. Breastfeeding peer counseling: from efficacy through scale-up.Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association · 2010
    Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Peer support telephone calls for improving health.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Britton
F M McCormick
M J Renfrew
A Wade
S E King
University of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is extensive evidence of the benefits of breastfeeding for infants and mothers. In 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended infants be fed exclusively on breast milk until six months of age. However, breastfeeding rates in many developed countries continue to be resistant to change.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of support for breastfeeding mothers. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2005), EMBASE (1974 to November 2005) and MIDIRS (1991 to September 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing extra support for breastfeeding mothers with usual maternity care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN

resultsWe have included 34 trials (29,385 mother-infant pairs) from 14 countries. All forms of extra support analysed together showed an increase in duration of 'any breastfeeding' (includes partial and exclusive breastfeeding) (relative risk (RR) for stopping any breastfeeding before six months 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 0.96). All forms of extra support together had a larger effect on duration of exclusive breastfeeding than on any breastfeeding (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89). Lay and professional support together extended duration of any breastfeeding significantly (RR before 4-6 weeks 0.65, 95% 0.51 to 0.82; RR before 2 months 0.74, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.83). Exclusive breastfeeding was significantly prolonged with use of WHO/UNICEF training (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.91). Maternal satisfaction was poorly reported. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAdditional professional support was effective in prolonging any breastfeeding, but its effects on exclusive breastfeeding were less clear. WHO/UNICEF training courses appeared to be effective for professional training. Additional lay support was effective in prolonging exclusive breastfeeding, while its effects on duration of any breastfeeding were uncertain. Effective support offered by professionals and lay people together was specific to breastfeeding and was offered to women who had decided to breastfeed. Further trials are required to assess the effectiveness (including cost-effectiveness) of both lay and professional support in different settings, particularly those with low rates of breastfeeding initiation, and for women who wish to breastfeed for longer than three months. Trials should consider timing and delivery of support interventions and relative effectiveness of intervention components, and should report women's views. Research into appropriate training for supporters (whether lay or professional) of breastfeeding mothers is also needed.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingFemaleHumansPatient Education as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID17253455
OpenAlexW1517144089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.