SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Interventions for varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy of physiotherapy for the prevention and treatment of prenatal symptoms: a systematic review.International urogynecology journal · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions for varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- High day-to-day reliability in lower leg volume measured by water displacement.European journal of applied physiology · 2008Trial
- Article
- Positive perception and efficacy of compression stockings for prevention of lower limb edema in pregnant women.Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2022Article
- Global impact and contributing factors in varicose vein disease development.SAGE open medicine · 2022Review
- Pregnancy-associated adaptations in [Ca2+]i-dependent and Ca2+ sensitization mechanisms of venous contraction: implications in pregnancy-related venous disorders.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2016Article
- Graduated compression stockings.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2014Review
- The effect of pregnancy on venous valve repair to the sapheno-femoral junction for varicose veins.Obstetric medicine · 2014Article
- Lymph drainage in pregnant women.Nursing research and practice · 2013Article
- Minor ailments in pregnancy are not a minor concern for pregnant women: a morbidity assessment survey in rural Sri Lanka.PloS one · 2013Article
- Productivity cost due to maternal ill health in Sri Lanka.PloS one · 2012Article
- Treatment of a patient with post-natal chronic calf pain utilizing instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization: a case study.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2011Article
- Review of evidence for environmental causes of uveal coloboma.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPregnancy is presumed to be a major contributory factor in the increased incidence of varicose veins in women, which can in turn lead to venous insufficiency and leg oedema. The most common symptom of varicose veins and oedema is the substantial pain experienced, as well as night cramps, numbness, tingling, the legs may feel heavy, achy, and possibly be unsightly. Treatment of varicose veins are usually divided into three main groups: surgery, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Treatments of leg oedema comprise mostly of symptom reduction rather than cure and use pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches.
objectivesTo assess any form of intervention used to relieve the symptoms associated with varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (October 2006). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of treatments for varicose veins or leg oedema, or both, in pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility, methodological quality and extracted all data. MAIN
resultsThree trials, involving 159 women, were included. VARICOSE VEINS: One trial, involving 69 women, reported that rutoside significantly reduced the symptoms associated with varicose veins (relative risk (RR) 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11 to 3.22). There were no significant differences in side-effects (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.13 to 5.79) or incidence of deep vein thrombosis (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.49). OEDEMA: One trial, involving 35 women, reported no significant difference in lower leg volume when compression stockings were compared against rest (weighted mean difference -258.80, 95% CI -566.91 to 49.31). Another trial, involving 55 women, compared reflexology with rest. Reflexology significantly reduced the symptoms associated with oedema (reduction in symptoms: RR 9.09, 95% CI 1.41 to 58.54). There was no evidence of significant difference in the women's satisfaction and acceptability with either intervention (RR 6.00, 95% CI 0.92 to 39.11). AUTHORS'
conclusionsRutosides appear to help relieve the symptoms of varicose veins in late pregnancy. However, this finding is based on one small study (69 women) and there are not enough data presented in the study to assess its safety in pregnancy. It therefore cannot be routinely recommended. Reflexology appears to help improve symptoms for women with leg oedema, but again this is based on one small study (43 women). External compression stockings do not appear to have any advantages in reducing oedema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.