Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17252230›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2007

Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

Calliope Maris, Benoît Martin, Jacques Creteur, Myriam Remmelink, Michael Piagnerelli, Isabelle Salmon, Jean-Louis Vincent, Pieter Demetter

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Estimated Burden of Fungal Infections in Oman.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. [Autopsy-a procedure of medical history?].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical review: What is the role for autopsy in the ICU?Critical care (London, England) · 2010
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Calliope MarisDepartment of Pathology, Erasme University Hospital, 808 Route de Lennik, Brussels, 1070, Belgium.
Benoît Martin
Jacques Creteur
Myriam Remmelink
Michael Piagnerelli
Isabelle Salmon
Jean-Louis Vincent
Pieter Demetter
Mie University Hospital · JPErasmus Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The autopsy has long been regarded as an important tool for clinical confrontation, education and quality assurance. The aims of this study were to examine the correlation between the clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings in adult patients who died in an intensive care unit (ICU) and to identify the types of errors in diagnosis to improve quality of care. Autopsies from 289 patients who died in the ICU during a 2-year period were studied. Post-mortem examination revealed unexpected findings in 61 patients (21%) including malignancy, pulmonary embolism, aspergillosis, myocardial or mesenteric infarction and unsuspected bacterial, viral or fungal infection. These unexpected findings were classified as Goldman class I errors in 17 (6%), class II in 38 (13%) and class III in six (2%) cases. Although the incidence of unexpected findings with clinical significance was low, post-mortem examination remains a valuable source of pertinent information that may improve the management of ICU patients.

Indexed as

AutopsyCause of DeathDiagnostic ErrorsIntensive Care UnitsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID17252230
OpenAlexW1984172245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.