ReviewJournal of plant research2007
Plant microtubule studies: past and present.
Review in Journal of plant research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunodetection of tubulin and centromeric histone H3 (CENH3) proteins in Glycine species.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Genome-wide analysis of the TPX2 family proteins in Eucalyptus grandis.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Oocyte Meiotic Spindle Assembly and Function.Current topics in developmental biology · 2016Review
- Characterization and functional analysis of the potato pollen-specific microtubule-associated protein SBgLR in tobacco.PloS one · 2013Article
- Article
- Diversity in meiotic spindle origin and determination of cytokinetic planes in sporogenesis of complex thalloid liverworts (Marchantiopsida).Journal of plant research · 2010Article
- Analysis of flagellar phosphoproteins from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.Eukaryotic cell · 2009Article
- Mechanism of action of nitrous oxide gas applied as a polyploidizing agent during meiosis in lilies.Sexual plant reproduction · 2009Article
- Evaluating the microtubule cytoskeleton and its interacting proteins in monocots by mining the rice genome.Annals of botany · 2009Review
- Microtubule-associated proteins in higher plants.Journal of plant research · 2007Review
- Role of microtubules in tip growth of fungi.Journal of plant research · 2007Article
- Twisted growth and organization of cortical microtubules.Journal of plant research · 2007Review
- Microtubule-dependent microtubule nucleation in plant cells.Journal of plant research · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here, I briefly review historical and morphological aspects of plant microtubule studies in land plants. Microtubules are formed from tubulins, and the polymeric configurations appear as singlet, doublet, and triplet microtubules. Doublet microtubules occur in the axoneme of cilia and flagella, and triplet microtubules occur in the basal bodies and centrosomes. Doublet and triplet microtubules are lost in all angiosperms and some gymnosperms that do not possess flagellated sperm. In land plants with flagellated sperm, centriolar centrosomes transform into basal bodies during spermatogenesis. In flowering plants, however, most male gametes (sperm) are conveyed to eggs without the benefit of cilia or flagella; thus, higher plants lack centriolar centrosome and doublet and triplet microtubules. The loss of centriolar centrosomes from the life cycle of flowering plants may have influenced the evolution of the plant microtubule system. Comparison of mitotic apparatuses in basal land plants and flowering plants illuminates the evolutionary transition from the centriolar microtubule system to the acentriolar microtubule system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.