Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17252055›Full record

ArticlePloS one2007

Pre-bilaterian origins of the Hox cluster and the Hox code: evidence from the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis.

Joseph F Ryan, Maureen E Mazza, Kevin Pang, David Q Matus, Andreas D Baxevanis, Mark Q Martindale, John R Finnerty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ParaHox Genes Revisited: From Gut Patterning to Integrated Axial and Neural Organization in Rotifera.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Aboral cell types ofScience advances · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A conservedRNA biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph F RyanBioinformatics Program, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Maureen E Mazza
Kevin Pang
David Q Matus
Andreas D Baxevanis
Mark Q Martindale
John R Finnerty

Funding

Structural /Phylogenetic Studies of Homeodomain ProteinZ01HG000140 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BAXEVANIS, ANDREAS D. · 1999 to 2008
$1.4M
Effect of diet on insulin sensitivity and energy balanceF32AG021374 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS MED SCIS LTL ROCK · PI HAYS, NICHOLAS PAUL · 2003 to 2005
$141k
Intramural NIH HHSNIA NIH HHS F32 AG021374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHox genes were critical to many morphological innovations of bilaterian animals. However, early Hox evolution remains obscure. Phylogenetic, developmental, and genomic analyses on the cnidarian sea anemone Nematostella vectensis challenge recent claims that the Hox code is a bilaterian invention and that no "true" Hox genes exist in the phylum Cnidaria. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsPhylogenetic analyses of 18 Hox-related genes from Nematostella identify putative Hox1, Hox2, and Hox9+ genes. Statistical comparisons among competing hypotheses bolster these findings, including an explicit consideration of the gene losses implied by alternate topologies. In situ hybridization studies of 20 Hox-related genes reveal that multiple Hox genes are expressed in distinct regions along the primary body axis, supporting the existence of a pre-bilaterian Hox code. Additionally, several Hox genes are expressed in nested domains along the secondary body axis, suggesting a role in "dorsoventral" patterning. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: A cluster of anterior and posterior Hox genes, as well as ParaHox cluster of genes evolved prior to the cnidarian-bilaterian split. There is evidence to suggest that these clusters were formed from a series of tandem gene duplication events and played a role in patterning both the primary and secondary body axes in a bilaterally symmetrical common ancestor. Cnidarians and bilaterians shared a common ancestor some 570 to 700 million years ago, and as such, are derived from a common body plan. Our work reveals several conserved genetic components that are found in both of these diverse lineages. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that a set of developmental rules established in the common ancestor of cnidarians and bilaterians is still at work today.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenes, HomeoboxAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBody PatterningGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyPhylogenySea AnemonesSequence AlignmentSequence Homology, Amino Acid

Identifiers

PMID17252055
PMCPMC1779807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.