ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2006
Use of dexmedetomidine versus general anesthesia for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The protective and hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine on hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients in the perioperative period.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While abdominal aortic aneurysms have traditionally been treated with a major open surgical procedure, minimally invasive endovascular techniques are much less traumatic, with significantly less strain on the heart and vital organs. A sedation technique using dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2-adrenoreceptor agonist, was developed for this procedure. We retrospectively reviewed records of 231 patients who underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms at the Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital from January 1, 2001, until September 30, 2005. Intraoperative and early postoperative data of 14 patients who had endovascular repairs using the dexmedetomidine sedation technique were compared with those of 22 patients who received general endotracheal tube anesthesia for the procedure during the time period of January 1, 2003, through September 1, 2005. The surgery and anesthesia times were shorter in the dexmedetomidine group, and less opioid medication was required. In addition, the postoperative pain scores were lower, and the need for postoperative pain medication was less in the dexmedetomidine group. This retrospective analysis demonstrates that a dexmedetomidine sedation technique offers a successful alternative to routine general anesthesia for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.