Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17252021›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2007

Effect of priming with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in younger adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) Group.

X Thomas, E Raffoux, S de Botton, C Pautas, P Arnaud, T de Revel, O Reman, C Terré, B Corront, C Gardin and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00880243 (Effect of Priming With Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor During Chemotherapy and Comparison of Timed Sequential Chemotherapy vs 4 Courses of High Dose Cytarabine as Consolidation in Younger Adults With Newly Diagnosed AML), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00880243 phase3completednot on this map

Effect of Priming With Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor During Chemotherapy and Comparison of Timed Sequential Chemotherapy vs 4 Courses of High Dose Cytarabine as Consolidation in Younger Adults With Newly Diagnosed AML

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcute Leukemia French AssociationRan1999 to 2006Enrolled473ConditionsAcute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsGM-CSF
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. SMART designs in cancer research: Past, present, and future.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The hematopoietic stem cell niche.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Immune-based therapeutics for pediatric cancer.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2010
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

X ThomasDepartment of Hematology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France. xavier.thomas@chu-lyon.fr
E Raffoux
S de Botton
C Pautas
P Arnaud
T de Revel
O Reman
C Terré
B Corront
C Gardin
Q-H Le
B Quesnel
C Cordonnier
J-H Bourhis
M Elhamri
P Fenaux
C Preudhomme
M Michallet
S Castaigne
H Dombret

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a multicenter trial, 259 young adults (15-49 years) with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were first randomized to receive a timed-sequential induction regimen given either alone (135 patients) or concomitantly with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (124 patients). Patients reaching complete remission (CR) were then randomized to compare a timed-sequential consolidation to a postremission chemotherapy including four cycles of high-dose cytarabine followed by maintenance courses. In the appropriate arm, GM-CSF was given concurrently with chemotherapy during all cycles of consolidation. CR rates were significantly better in the GM-CSF arm (88 vs 78%, P<0.04), but did not differ after salvage. Patients receiving GM-CSF had a higher 3-year event-free survival (EFS) estimate (42 vs 34%), but GM-CSF did not impact on overall survival. Patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics benefited more from GM-CSF therapy (P=0.05) in terms of EFS than patients with other cytogenetics. This was also confirmed when considering only patients following the second randomization, or subgroups defined by a prognostic index based on cytogenetics and the number of courses required for achieving CR. Priming of leukemic cells with hematopoietic growth factors is a means of enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapy in younger adults with AML.

Indexed as

PremedicationAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAmsacrineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell DivisionCombined Modality TherapyCytarabineDaunorubicinDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansAmsacrineCytarabineDaunorubicinGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorMitoxantronemolgramostimRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17252021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.