Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17251456›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2007

The fate of limbal epithelial progenitor cells during explant culture on intact amniotic membrane.

Wei Li, Yasutaka Hayashida, Hua He, Ching-Liang Kuo, Scheffer C G Tseng

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Limbal stem cells: identity, developmental origin, and therapeutic potential.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei LiOcular Surface Center, and TissueTech, Inc., Miami, Florida 33173, USA.
Yasutaka Hayashida
Hua He
Ching-Liang Kuo
Scheffer C G Tseng
Ocular Surface Center · US

Funding

VITAMIN A AND CONJUNCTIVAL TRANSDIFFERENTIATIONR01EY006819 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI TSENG, SCHEFFER CG · 1986 to 2020
$6.7M
TRANSPLANTATION OF EXPANDED LIMBAL EPITHELIAL STEM CELLSR01EY015735 · NEI · TISSUETECH, INC. · PI TSENG, SCHEFFER C G · 2004 to 2007
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY006819NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015735NEI NIH HHS R01 EY06819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe clinical success of treating corneas with total limbal stem cell deficiency using limbal biopsy explants cultured on intact amniotic membrane (iAM) relies on ex vivo expansion of limbal epithelial progenitor cells. However, the ultimate fate of limbal epithelial progenitor cells in the explant remains unclear.

methodsHuman limbal explants were cultured on iAM for 2 weeks and then removed and transferred to a new iAM until passage 3. The outgrowth surface area of each passage was measured and compared. For each passage, clonogenicity on 3T3 fibroblasts feeder layers was compared among progenitor cells removed from the outgrowth, the explant surface, and the remaining stroma. Cryosections of the explant and the outgrowth were detected with p63, vimentin, pancytokeratin, and the basement membrane components type VII and IV collagen and laminin 5 antibodies.

resultsThe outgrowth surface area significantly decreased from passage (P)1 to P3. The total number of epithelial cells that were isolated from the explant surface also decreased from before culture (P0) to P1, became stable from P1 to P2, but was uncountable at P3. Clonogenicity significantly declined from P1 to P3 for the epithelium derived from the explant surface and the outgrowth epithelium; the extent was less in the former than in the latter at P2 and P3. In addition, groups of epithelial cells invaded the limbal stroma of the explants from P1 to P3; p63(+)/pancytokeratin(-) and p63(+)/vimentin(+) cells also presented in the limbal stroma. Increasing fibroblast, but not epithelial, colonies were observed from cells isolated from the remaining limbal stroma when seeded on 3T3 fibroblast feeder layers from P1 to P3.

conclusionsDuring ex vivo expansion on iAM, some limbal epithelial progenitor cells indeed migrate onto iAM from the explant surface, whereas some also invade the limbal stroma, very likely undergoing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. This new information should be taken into account in formulating new strategies to improve the expansion protocol.

Indexed as

Amnion3T3 CellsAnimalsBiomarkersCell MovementCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesColony-Forming Units AssayEpithelial CellsEpithelium, CornealExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansIntermediate Filament ProteinsLimbus CorneaeBiomarkersExtracellular Matrix ProteinsIntermediate Filament Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17251456
PMCPMC3197022
OpenAlexW1995865777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.