Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17251333›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2007

DNA diagnostics by surface-bound melt-curve reactions.

Linda Strömqvist Meuzelaar, Katie Hopkins, Ernesto Liebana, Anthony J Brookes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genotyping by alkaline dehybridization using graphically encoded particles.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2011
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda Strömqvist MeuzelaarDepartment of Genetics, University of Leicester, University Rd., Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Katie Hopkins
Ernesto Liebana
Anthony J Brookes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melting-curve procedures track DNA denaturation in real time and so provide an effective way of assessing sequence variants. Dynamic allele-specific hybridization (DASH) is one such method, based on fluorescence, which uses heat to denature a single allele-specific probe away from one strand of a polymerase chain reaction product attached to a solid support. DASH is a proven system for research genotyping, but here we evaluate it for DNA diagnostics under two scenarios. First, for mutation scanning (resequencing), a human genomic sequence of 97 bp was interrogated with 15 probes tiled with 12-base overlaps, providing up to fourfold redundancy per base. This test sequence spanned three high-frequency single nucleotide polymorphisms, all of which were correctly revealed in 16 individuals. Second, to score multiple different mutations in parallel, 18 alterations in the gyrA gene of Salmonella were assessed in 62 strains by using wild-type- and mutation-specific probes. Both experiments were performed in a blinded manner, and all results were confirmed by sequencing. All DNA variants were unambiguously resolved in every sample, with no false-positive or false-negative signals across all of the investigations. In conclusion, DASH performs accurately and robustly when applied to DNA diagnostic challenges, including mutation scoring and mutation scanning.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid DenaturationTransition TemperatureBase SequenceDNADNA GyraseDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA PrimersEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid HybridizationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSalmonellaSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNADNADNA GyraseDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID17251333
PMCPMC1867427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.