ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2007
DNA diagnostics by surface-bound melt-curve reactions.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genotyping by alkaline dehybridization using graphically encoded particles.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2011Article
- Microfludic device for creating ionic strength gradients over DNA microarrays for efficient DNA melting studies and assay development.PloS one · 2009Article
- Copy number variants and common disorders: filling the gaps and exploring complexity in genome-wide association studies.PLoS genetics · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melting-curve procedures track DNA denaturation in real time and so provide an effective way of assessing sequence variants. Dynamic allele-specific hybridization (DASH) is one such method, based on fluorescence, which uses heat to denature a single allele-specific probe away from one strand of a polymerase chain reaction product attached to a solid support. DASH is a proven system for research genotyping, but here we evaluate it for DNA diagnostics under two scenarios. First, for mutation scanning (resequencing), a human genomic sequence of 97 bp was interrogated with 15 probes tiled with 12-base overlaps, providing up to fourfold redundancy per base. This test sequence spanned three high-frequency single nucleotide polymorphisms, all of which were correctly revealed in 16 individuals. Second, to score multiple different mutations in parallel, 18 alterations in the gyrA gene of Salmonella were assessed in 62 strains by using wild-type- and mutation-specific probes. Both experiments were performed in a blinded manner, and all results were confirmed by sequencing. All DNA variants were unambiguously resolved in every sample, with no false-positive or false-negative signals across all of the investigations. In conclusion, DASH performs accurately and robustly when applied to DNA diagnostic challenges, including mutation scoring and mutation scanning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.