Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17251316›Full record

Trial reportThorax2007

Pharmacy Asthma Care Program (PACP) improves outcomes for patients in the community.

Carol Armour, Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich, Martha Brillant, Debbie Burton, Lynne Emmerton, Ines Krass, Bandana Saini, Lorraine Smith, Kay Stewart

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thorax, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pharmacist services for non-hospitalised patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Interventions to improve adherence to inhaled steroids for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  8. Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering medication.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Chronic disease management programmes for adults with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  12. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Patient-Centered Outcomes of Medication Adherence Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
    Pooled it
  17. Guideline
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carol ArmourFaculty of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Building A15, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. carola@pharm.usyd.edu.au
Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
Martha Brillant
Debbie Burton
Lynne Emmerton
Ines Krass
Bandana Saini
Lorraine Smith
Kay Stewart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite national disease management plans, optimal asthma management remains a challenge in Australia. Community pharmacists are ideally placed to implement new strategies that aim to ensure asthma care meets current standards of best practice. The impact of the Pharmacy Asthma Care Program (PACP) on asthma control was assessed using a multi-site randomised intervention versus control repeated measures study design.

methodsFifty Australian pharmacies were randomised into two groups: intervention pharmacies implemented the PACP (an ongoing cycle of assessment, goal setting, monitoring and review) to 191 patients over 6 months, while control pharmacies gave their usual care to 205 control patients. Both groups administered questionnaires and conducted spirometric testing at baseline and 6 months later. The main outcome measure was asthma severity/control status.

results186 of 205 control patients (91%) and 165 of 191 intervention patients (86%) completed the study. The intervention resulted in improved asthma control: patients receiving the intervention were 2.7 times more likely to improve from "severe" to "not severe" than control patients (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.64 to 4.37; p<0.001). The intervention also resulted in improved adherence to preventer medication (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.30; p = 0.03), decreased mean daily dose of reliever medication (difference -149.11 microg, 95% CI -283.87 to -14.36; p=0.03), a shift in medication profile from reliever only to a combination of preventer, reliever with or without long-acting beta agonist (OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.40 to 10.32; p=0.01) and improved scores on risk of non-adherence (difference -0.44, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.18; p=0.04), quality of life (difference -0.23, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.00; p=0.05), asthma knowledge (difference 1.18, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.63; p<0.01) and perceived control of asthma questionnaires (difference -1.39, 95% CI -2.44 to -0.35; p<0.01). No significant change in spirometric measures occurred in either group.

conclusionsA pharmacist-delivered asthma care programme based on national guidelines improves asthma control. The sustainability and implementation of the programme within the healthcare system remains to be investigated.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaAustraliaCommunity Pharmacy ServicesEducation, PharmacyFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationReferral and ConsultationTreatment OutcomeVital CapacityAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID17251316
PMCPMC2117224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.