Trial reportThorax2007
Pharmacy Asthma Care Program (PACP) improves outcomes for patients in the community.
Trial report in Thorax, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
109 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pharmacist-Driven Outcomes in Asthma and COPD: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Medication Adherence.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review of pragmatic randomised control trials assessing the effectiveness of professional pharmacy services in community pharmacies.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Community pharmacy interventions for health promotion: effects on professional practice and health outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Cost Effectiveness of Advanced Pharmacy Services Provided in the Community and Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Pooled it
- Effects of an Asthma Self-Management Support Service Provided by Community Pharmacists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2018Pooled it
- Pharmacist services for non-hospitalised patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Interventions to improve adherence to inhaled steroids for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering medication.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Adding non-randomised studies to a Cochrane review brings complementary information for healthcare stakeholders: an augmented systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2016Pooled it
- Effectiveness of implementation strategies for clinical guidelines to community pharmacy: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2015Pooled it
- Chronic disease management programmes for adults with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacist-led fee-for-services medication review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Pooled it
- Interventions to modify health care provider adherence to asthma guidelines: a systematic review.Pediatrics · 2013Pooled it
- Anti-leukotriene agents compared to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Patient-Centered Outcomes of Medication Adherence Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes ResearchPooled it
- Asthma worsenings: approaches to prevention and management from the Asthma Worsenings Working Group.Canadian respiratory journalGuideline
- Effectiveness of a medication adherence management intervention in a community pharmacy setting: a cluster randomised controlled trial.BMJ quality & safety · 2022Trial
- A cluster randomised control trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Italian medicines use review (I-MUR) for asthma patients.BMC health services research · 2017Trial
- Impact of Adding a Decision Aid to Patient Education in Adults with Asthma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PloS one · 2017Trial
49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite national disease management plans, optimal asthma management remains a challenge in Australia. Community pharmacists are ideally placed to implement new strategies that aim to ensure asthma care meets current standards of best practice. The impact of the Pharmacy Asthma Care Program (PACP) on asthma control was assessed using a multi-site randomised intervention versus control repeated measures study design.
methodsFifty Australian pharmacies were randomised into two groups: intervention pharmacies implemented the PACP (an ongoing cycle of assessment, goal setting, monitoring and review) to 191 patients over 6 months, while control pharmacies gave their usual care to 205 control patients. Both groups administered questionnaires and conducted spirometric testing at baseline and 6 months later. The main outcome measure was asthma severity/control status.
results186 of 205 control patients (91%) and 165 of 191 intervention patients (86%) completed the study. The intervention resulted in improved asthma control: patients receiving the intervention were 2.7 times more likely to improve from "severe" to "not severe" than control patients (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.64 to 4.37; p<0.001). The intervention also resulted in improved adherence to preventer medication (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.30; p = 0.03), decreased mean daily dose of reliever medication (difference -149.11 microg, 95% CI -283.87 to -14.36; p=0.03), a shift in medication profile from reliever only to a combination of preventer, reliever with or without long-acting beta agonist (OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.40 to 10.32; p=0.01) and improved scores on risk of non-adherence (difference -0.44, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.18; p=0.04), quality of life (difference -0.23, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.00; p=0.05), asthma knowledge (difference 1.18, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.63; p<0.01) and perceived control of asthma questionnaires (difference -1.39, 95% CI -2.44 to -0.35; p<0.01). No significant change in spirometric measures occurred in either group.
conclusionsA pharmacist-delivered asthma care programme based on national guidelines improves asthma control. The sustainability and implementation of the programme within the healthcare system remains to be investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.